Replication materials: EN.I.SCORE regional energy-readiness study, Eastern Macedonia and Thrace, 2024

Replication materials: EN.I.SCORE regional energy-readiness study, Eastern Macedonia and Thrace, 2024 Everything in this record can be shared without restriction. Nothing here is at firm level. The firm-level survey responses are not deposited, here or anywhere else, and are not available on request. Respondents were given an undertaking that their information would remain confidential and would be used for academic and research purposes only. A confidentiality promise is not discharged by restricting who receives the data, so no repository deposit and no request-based release is open to us. The materials in this record are what can be shared, and they are sufficient to verify every quantity reported in the article. What is in this record Instrument and coding frames data_dictionary_items.csv gives the fifteen EN.I.SCORE items. data_dictionary_scale.csv gives the five scale anchors, which run from -2 to +2 and are recoded to 1-5 by adding 3 for all analysis. qualitative_codebook_20themes.csv is the codebook applied to the open-ended responses, with an operational definition and an EN-item link for each of the twenty themes. classification_rules.csv gives the deterministic rules defining the eleven ecosystem-position flags, which use fixed numeric thresholds and exact category membership rather than sample-relative cut-offs, so classification does not shift with the sample. keyword_dictionaries.csv gives the term lists used for the interview issue-space analysis. Aggregate results, sufficient to check every quantity reported in the article item_statistics_aggregate.csv gives n, mean, standard deviation, and top-two and bottom-two box shares for each of the fifteen items. composite_statistics_aggregate.csv gives the mean, standard deviation and Cronbach's alpha for the macro, meso, micro, RASI and overall composites. theme_prevalence_aggregate.csv and position_prevalence_aggregate.csv give counts and percentages for the twenty qualitative themes and the eleven position flags. interview_keyword_counts.csv gives per-interview keyword totals for the fourteen transcripts, as counts only. Analysis code and output Three SPSS syntax files reproduce the descriptive, comparative and clustering results, with their output logs and the additional robustness reporting. README_SPSS_ENISCORE.txt documents the run order. What is deliberately not here The firm-level responses. Not deposited anywhere, for the reason given above. A supporting measurement, had the undertaking permitted a restricted deposit, would have blocked it in any case: 64 of the 89 responding firms, that is 71.9 per cent, are uniquely identified by the combination of regional unit, employee band, revenue band and role alone. No firm sits in a group of five or more on those four attributes, and one of the six regional units contains a single responding firm. Coarsening enough to defeat that would destroy the regional and size variation the analysis depends on. The verbatim open-ended responses. The most disclosive text in the study, and not released in any form. No quantity reported in the article depends on them, because every published result runs off the coded theme flags rather than the text. The interview transcripts. Fourteen experts gave these under a confidentiality undertaking and they are not deposited in any form. Only derived keyword counts appear, in this record. Citation Cite the article, and cite this record and its restricted companion by their DOIs.