Dominance, affiliation and coalition patterns among females: empirical data and GrooFiWorld.

Coalition patterns: empirical results of egalitarian and despotic species are lumped except for the frequency of coalition types which are reported in a single study [121]. Results represent the average over 10 runs. P-value based on the Bonferroni correction:
* = p<0.05;
** = p<0.01,
*** = p<0.001.
1Among all individuals.
2See our previously analyzed empirical data in: [36];
3[42].
4These species include more than macaques, also baboons and chimpanzees.
5Excluding vocal coalitions/including vocal coalitions.
6[90].
7[121].
8[17]: This study concerns males and females combined;
9[13];
10Omitting support from the relationship quality index [13];
1113,26,28,29 in Table 1;
122,6,8,9,13,14,18,19,20,29 in Table 1;
134,11,12,13,29 in Table 1.
14[30].
15Supporter higher ranking than target and recipient: + more frequent than chance; − less frequent than chance.