five

ACES and Built Environment Scoping Review Search Strategy

收藏
DataCite Commons2022-09-15 更新2024-07-13 收录
下载链接:
https://scholarshare.temple.edu/handle/20.500.12613/8170
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
To identify studies to include or consider for this scoping review, the review team worked with a medical librarian (SR) to develop detailed search strategies for each database. The PRISMA-S extension was followed for search reporting. The medical librarian (SR) developed the search for PubMed (NLM) and translated the search for every database searched. The PubMed (NLM) search strategy was reviewed by the research team to check for accuracy and term relevancy, and all final searches were peer-reviewed by another medical librarian following the PRESS checklist. The databases included in this search are PubMed (NLM), Embase (Elsevier), Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics), Cochrane Central (Wiley), PsycInfo (EbscoHost) and CINAHL (EbscoHost) using a combination of keywords and subject headings. A grey literature search included a clinical trials registry (clinicaltrials.gov) and the TRIP Pro medical database (tripdatabase.com) website. There were no limits to the search. All final searches were performed on June 2, 2022 by the librarian and were fully reported (SR). A summary of the search results from databases: PubMed (NLM) from inception to 6/2/2022 (3,635 Results) Embase (Elsevier) from inception to 6/2/2022 (3,085 Results) Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) from inception to 6/2/2022 (3,578 Results) Cochrane Central (Wiley) from inception to 6/2/2022 (390 Results) PsycInfo (EbscoHost) from inception to 6/2/2022 (4,247 Results) CINAHL (EbscoHost) from inception to 6/2/2022 (4,255 Results) The search resulted in 19,365 studies and 5,702 duplicate studies were found and omitted by the librarian (SR) using the EndNote 20 duplicate identification strategy. This resulted in 13,542 records to screen from databases or registers and 121 records to screen from other methods, resulting in a total of 13,663 records. Studies were screened by title and abstract by two blinded and independent reviewers. If a tiebreaker was needed, a third reviewer was called in. This process was repeated for full text article screening and article selection.
提供机构:
My University
创建时间:
2022-09-15
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作