Replication Data and Code for: A comment on Dincecco et al. (2022): Pre-colonial warfare and long-run development in India

The data and programs replicate tables and figures from "A comment on Dincecco et al. (2022): Pre-colonial warfare and long-run development in India", by Forshaw, Ölkers, Sethi, and Sovani. Please see the ReadMe file for additional details.

We test the reproducibility and replicability of Dincecco et al. (2022),
which reports a positive relationship between pre-colonial interstate warfare
and long-run development patterns across India. Overall, we confirm that all
of the study’s estimates are computationally reproducible using the provided
replication package in Stata, but note that the ease of replication could be
improved by the provision of code and intermediate datasets for the conflict
exposure measure. We test for and find no evidence of data manipulation in
the final datasets. Concerning direct replicability, we consider different ways
of measuring distance to conflicts and also alternative proxies for both the
dependent variable and variables which capture channels by which the main
effects operate. We find that some estimates are sensitive to the type of con-
flict considered. Other estimates are sensitive to the time period considered,
most likely due to time heterogeneity in the number of conflicts recorded.
Nevertheless, most estimates are substantially in line with the original study.