Exploring the signals in the data used by Solovyeva et al. (2018)

This is a preliminary fileset following the suggestion of one of the authors of the paper to do consensus networks based on these data by myself in response to two questions I had on the paper (https://peerj.com/questions/3501-what-to-the-hyphens-stand-for-low-amplitude-signal/#annotation-3508)<br><br>It shows the typical issues of non-trivial data sets: decreased support either relates to low amplitude signal or two (rarer three) competing topological alternatives found in the bootstrap samples that can be inferred from each gene region. The best-known trees are not necessarily showing the best-supported alternative. In some cases the (including weak) signals from each gene region are additive (high support in the combined tree, see original paper), in others not (low support in the combined tree).<br><br>So far it includes only<br>A 7z archive (<b>Lizard.7z</b>) with the results of an unpartitioned maximum likelihood analysis of the provided single-gene data as well as the NEXUS-reformatted matrices based on the FASTA-files provided in the supplementary information to the original paper. For further details (labelling conventions, software; see ReadMe.txt in the archive).<br><br>When re-using these data make sure to also reference the original publication:<br>Solovyeva​ EN, Lebedev VS, Dunayev EA, Nazarov RA, Bannikova AA, Che J, Murphy RW, Poyarkov​ NA. 2018. Cenozoic aridization in Central Eurasia shaped diversification of toad-headed agamas (Phrynocephalus; Agamidae, Reptilia). PeerJ 6:e4543. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4543<br>