Data and code belonging to the article "Too much of a good thing? Estimating the trade-off between voter turnout and the representativeness of election results when studying turnout shocks."

The materials here will replicate the main results of the paper "Too much of a good thing? Estimating the trade-off between voter turnout and the representativeness of election results when studying turnout shocks.", being Figure 2 and Tables 1 and 3. The enclosed files (almost all of which are Stata-files) will create the dataset used for the analysis and the main figures and tables of the paper. The code begins with files from input sources. That is, all steps of the process, including data cleaning, are performed in this replication. Note that in the paper we also use data from a LISS panel survey called "Wiv Referendum 2018: Third measurement". This data is not included in the files and is not required for running the do-file. The agency that ran this survey prefers it when researchers directly download this (opensource) data from their website: https://www.dataarchive.lissdata.nl/study-units/view/815 (doi: 10.17026/dans-xcr-n8az)<br><strong style="background-color:rgb(255, 238, 204);">Derived From:</strong>Statistics NetherlandsKiesraadSpatial expertise center University of Groningen

本材料可复现论文《Too much of a good thing? Estimating the trade-off between voter turnout and the representativeness of election results when studying turnout shocks.》的核心研究结果，即图2与表1、表3。所附文件几乎均为Stata文件，可生成本研究分析所用数据集，以及论文中的核心图表与表格。本代码以输入源文件为基础启动，本次复现涵盖了包括数据清洗在内的全部流程环节。

需说明的是，本论文同时使用了一项名为“Wiv 2018年公投：第三次测量”的LISS面板调查（LISS panel survey）数据，但该数据未包含在本文件包中，且运行do文件无需使用该数据。负责实施该调查的机构建议研究人员直接从其官网下载该开源数据：https://www.dataarchive.lissdata.nl/study-units/view/815 (doi: 10.17026/dans-xcr-n8az)。

数据来源：荷兰统计局（Statistics Netherlands）、荷兰选举委员会（Kiesraad）、格罗宁根大学空间专业研究中心