five

Comparative Quantitation of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients with CMV Infection by Using Two High-Throughput Automated Systems

收藏
PubMed Central2026-05-16 收录
下载链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC88568/
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA quantitation in clinical specimens is progressively becoming a cornerstone in the diagnosis and management of CMV infection in the immunocompromised host. We evaluated two automated and reproducible PCR tests, the LightCycler (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, Ind.) and the COBAS AMPLICOR CMV Monitor (Roche Diagnostics, Pleasanton, Calif.), for the detection of CMV DNA in blood samples from transplant recipients with CMV infection as determined by shell vial culture. Following a log transformation analysis, the mean CMV DNA in plasma (PL), whole blood (WB), peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL), and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) using the LightCycler was 6.79 copies per ml, 7.23 copies per ml, 6.38 copies per 2 × 10(6) cells, and 6.27 copies per 2 × 10(6) cells, respectively. This compares to 7.86 copies per ml, 8.37 copies per ml, 7.59 copies per 2 × 10(6) cells, and 7.44 copies per 2 × 10(6) cells, respectively, using COBAS AMPLICOR CMV Monitor. While higher CMV DNA levels were observed for the various blood compartments analyzed using COBAS AMPLICOR CMV Monitor, a high degree of correlation was evident between the two automated systems (jackknife correlation r = PL 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI); 0.64, 0.90], WB 0.77 [95% CI; 0.62, 0.92], PBL 0.77 [95% CI; 0.67, 0.88], and PBMC 0.81 [95% CI; 0.72, 0.89], all P < 0.001). Therefore, we conclude that either automated diagnostic system is accurate for CMV DNA quantitation.
提供机构:
American Society for Microbiology (ASM)
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务