登录后查看消息通知
搜索
常见问题
消息
登录
首页
/
数据集
/
Comparison of mean SDM on the registration accuracy.
Comparison of mean SDM on the registration accuracy.
收藏
NIAID Data Ecosystem
2026-03-11 收录
图像配准方法比较
配准精度评估
数据链接：
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Comparison_of_mean_SDM_on_the_registration_accuracy_/10689650
数据链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务：
问题咨询
购买咨询
在线客服
NEW
资源简介：
Comparison of mean SDM on the registration accuracy.
应用场景：
创建时间：
2019-11-21
相关数据集
Comparison of gap/overlap for the DIR-LAB data set by case.
医学图像配准
配准精度评估
The purposed CC-DIR algorithm shows the least overlap compared to the six other methods. It rates second in terms of interface gap with a mean offset of 38.1 cm3 to the first place. All measurements a
Figshare
2023-08-18 更新
2
0
Comparison of TREs for the DIR-LAB data set in mm.
医学图像配准
配准精度评估
The mean TRE of the purposed CC-DIR method ranks at fourth place out of seven with an offset of 0.15 mm to the best performing algorithm.
NIAID Data Ecosystem
0
0
Average root mean squared distances (mm) for the different registration steps, averaged over all 5 subjects.
医学图像配准
配准精度评估
Average root mean squared distances (mm) for the different registration steps, averaged over all 5 subjects.
Figshare
2015-12-02 更新
0
0
Average root mean squared distances (mm) for the different registration steps, averaged over all 5 subjects.
医学图像配准
配准精度评估
Average root mean squared distances (mm) for the different registration steps, averaged over all 5 subjects.
NIAID Data Ecosystem
2
0
Cross validation results on the registration accuracy of the pubic bone.
医学图像配准
配准精度评估
MDE—Mean Distance Error (mm).
Figshare
2019-11-21 更新
0
0
© 2023-2026 上海数据发展科技有限责任公司 版权所有
沪ICP备17003045号-15
沪公网安备31010402336585号
热门搜索
社区交流群
科研交流群
商业服务
数据资源
寻源服务
数据采集
标注服务
数据产品
代理销售
数据领域
凭证登记
数据产品
介绍推广
