five

Cost-effectiveness of 12-monthly point-of-care viral load monitoring (strategy 4.2) compared with clinical monitoring (strategy 2.1), assuming that the risk of virological failure is either identical in both strategies (Scenario A) or twice as high with viral load monitoring than with clinical monitoring (Scenario B).

收藏
NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-03-08 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Cost_effectiveness_of_12_monthly_point_of_care_viral_load_monitoring_strategy_4_2_compared_with_clinical_monitoring_strategy_2_1_assuming_that_the_risk_of_virological_failure_is_either_identical_in_both_strategies_Scenario_A_or_twice_as_high_with_viral_l/1345842
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
All performed sensitivity analyses are listed in S1 Table and their full results in S2 to S11 Tables of the Supplementary Material. The results of Analysis CD1 are not shown since the cost of CD4 test does not influence either strategy. The input values used in the main analysis are shown in Table 3. Cost-effectiveness of 12-monthly point-of-care viral load monitoring (strategy 4.2) compared with clinical monitoring (strategy 2.1), assuming that the risk of virological failure is either identical in both strategies (Scenario A) or twice as high with viral load monitoring than with clinical monitoring (Scenario B).
创建时间:
2015-03-20
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务