Comparison of empirically derived V4 16S rRNA sequencin OTU filtration parameters and their effect on three different analysis methods for in rumen microbiome samples. Filtration parameters are based

NIAID Data Ecosystem60

Additional file 13: of Comprehensive assessment of multiple biases in small RNA sequencing reveals significant differences in the performance of widely used methods

RNA测序偏差

生物医学方法比较

Table S10. Pairwise comparisons of batch error. Percent difference is calculated as the percent difference of the first method in the comparison relative to the second, thus Clontech had 33% less erro

Figshare2019-06-21 更新40

Mean difference and correlation of Biosensor and reference method by site in phase B.

生物传感器性能验证

生物医学方法比较

Mean difference and correlation of Biosensor and reference method by site in phase B.

NIAID Data Ecosystem60

Additional file 8 of Comparison study of differential abundance testing methods using two large Parkinson disease gut microbiome datasets derived from 16S amplicon sequencing

微生物组差异丰度

生物医学方法比较

Additional file 8: Table S7. Pairwise concordances between methods with summary statistics calculations. Differential abundance testing was performed using 23 methods on both unfiltered (A-C, 445 gene

NIAID Data Ecosystem40