Additional file 1 of Oviductal extracellular vesicles miRNA cargo varies in response to embryos and their quality

Supplementary Material 1: Supplementary data S1. MicroRNA profiling of EVs. Table 1. Overview of statistical comparison results and expression profiles of all miRNAs identified in EVs across all samples. Table 2. MicroRNAs with differential abundance (DA) in EV collected from BOEC co-cultured with embryos versus BOEC cultured (BE vs. B). Table 3. DA miRNAs in EV collected from BOEC co-cultured with good embryos versus BOEC co-cultured with poor embryos (BGE vs. BPE). Table 4. DA miRNAs in EV collected from BOEC co-cultured with good embryos versus BOEC cultured (BGE vs. B). Table 5. DA miRNAs in EV collected from BOEC co-cultured with poor embryos versus BOEC cultured (BPE vs. B). Table 6. DA miRNAs in EV collected from BOEC co-cultured with embryos versus embryos cultured alone (BE vs. E). Table 7. DA miRNAs in EV collected from BOEC co-cultured with good embryos versus good embryos cultured alone (BGE vs. GE). Table 8. DA miRNAs in EV collected from BOEC co-cultured with poor embryos versus poor embryos cultured alone (BPE vs. PE). Table 9. All DA miRNAs across EV samples used for SOTA analysis and list of miRNAs in the 6 clusters. Table 10. List of predicted target genes for miRNAs classified in A-E SOTA profiles identified by MIENTURNET tool. Table 11. Functional annotation enrichment analysis for predicted target genes for miRNAs classified in A-E SOTA expression profiles across EV samples conducted by Metascape. Table 12. DA miRNAs in EV collected from BOEC cultured alone versus medium controls (B vs. M). Table 13. DA miRNAs in EV collected from good embryos versus poor embryos cultured alone (GE vs. PE). Table 14. DA miRNAs in EV collected from embryos cultured alone (considering GE and PE together) versus medium (E vs. M).