Endoscopic treatments for rectal neuroendocrine tumors smaller than 16 mm: a meta-analysis
收藏Taylor & Francis Group2023-06-01 更新2026-04-16 收录
下载链接:
https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Endoscopic_treatments_for_rectal_neuroendocrine_tumors_smaller_than_16_mm_a_meta-analysis/3469748
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
<b>Objective:</b> Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), including conventional EMR (c-EMR) and modified EMR (m-EMR), was applied to remove small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). We aim to evaluate treatment outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), m-EMR and c-EMR for rectal NETs <16 mm. <b>Methods:</b> The PubMed, Cochrane Library and Elsevier Science Direct were searched to identify eligible articles. After quality assessment and data extraction, meta-analysis was performed. The main outcomes were complete resection rate, overall complication rate, procedure time and local recurrence rate. <b>Results:</b> Compared with c-EMR, ESD could achieve higher complete resection rate (OR = 4.38, 95%CI: 2.43–7.91, <i>p</i> < 0.00001) without increasing overall complication rates (OR = 2.21, 95%CI: 0.56–8.70, <i>p</i> = 0.25). However, ESD was more time-consuming than c-EMR (MD = 6.72, 95%CI: 5.84–7.60, <i>p</i> < 0.00001). Compared with m-EMR, ESD did not differ from m-EMR in complete resection and overall complication rates (OR = 0.80, 95%CI: 0.51–1.27, <i>p</i> = 0.34; OR = 1.91, 95%CI: 0.75–4.86, <i>p</i> = 0.18, respectively). However, ESD was more time-consuming than m-EMR (MD = 12.21, 95%CI: 7.78–16.64, <i>p</i> < 0.00001). Compared with c-EMR, m-EMR could achieve higher complete resection rate (OR = 4.23, 95%CI: 2.39–7.50, <i>p</i> < 0.00001) without increasing overall complication rate (OR = 1.07, 95%CI: 0.35–3.32, <i>p</i> = 0.90). Moreover, m-EMR was not time-consuming than c-EMR (MD = 2.01, 95%CI: −0.37–4.40, <i>p</i>= 0.10). The local recurrence rate was 0.84% (9/1067) during follow-up. <b>Conclusions:</b> Both ESD and m-EMR have great advantages over c-EMR in complete resection rate without increasing safety concern while m-EMR shares similar outcomes with ESD for rectal NETs <16 mm. The results should be confirmed by well-designed, multicenter, randomized controlled trials with large samples and long-term follow-ups from more countries.
提供机构:
Yang, Sheng; Wu, Wei; Lin, Jun; Zhang, Hai-Ping
创建时间:
2016-09-26



