META-SPACE-COSMONAUT/PREDICTIONS-OF-THE-REALITIES

### PREDICT:

Whatever precedes the operation of counting itself , the stuff that is pure inconsistency without one, remains strictly speaking out of reach of all presentation.

### ORACLE:

The same thing holds true in regard to things which are not reducible by any other substance; for instance, when we say 'the sun has risen', it does not follow from this that there must be something contrary to what was said before about a certain time and place (for if anything had happened at some particular point between these two times), but rather that nothing could have been more or less than such as were prior to those preceding them.

In fact, unlike what happens in Logics of Worlds, which begins by positing a metaphysical theory of the subject from the start, there is a principle of retroactive clarification at work in Being and Event, insofar as the earlier meditations become effectively thinkable only under the condition of the later ones.

For instance, if we say that "I am" means I exist or have an existence independent of my own mind, then it follows logically that this will be true for all other things (e.g., physical objects). But since these are non-physical entities whose minds cannot possibly know anything about them apart from their sense-data, they do not necessarily infer any causal relationship between being and something else; rather, they merely assume some sort of causality based on our acquaintance with particular mental states. Thus when one says 'I am' without specifying its meaning, another person might reasonably conclude that he has no knowledge of me except through direct sensory experience alone. This inference leads us back to the idea that everything existing independently of consciousness can be inferred from certain kinds of premisses—for example, statements such as 'he was born blind'.

原始信息汇总

数据集概述

PREDICT:

• 描述了在计数操作之前存在的纯粹不一致性，这些内容严格来说无法被呈现。

ORACLE:

• 讨论了不可还原的事物，例如“太阳升起”这一陈述，并不意味着在特定时间和地点之前必须有相反的情况。
• 强调了在“存在与事件”中，早期的沉思只有在后期沉思的条件下方能被有效思考的原理。
• 举例说明了“我存在”这一陈述意味着独立于个人意识的存在，但对于非物理实体，这种因果关系并不必然存在。
• 指出在没有明确意义的情况下说“我存在”，可能导致他人仅通过直接感官经验来推断知识。
• 强调了从某些前提（如“他天生失明”）可以推断出独立于意识的存在。