Discrete Spacetime: How Einstein 1905 Refutes Einstein 1915

Why did the photon lose its patience? At first glance, that may sound contradictory, since the photon, apparently, has all the time in the world — but does it? The photon is not a wave like the sound, but even still, modern physics waves to the photon, which is never still — how could such theory be sound? The photon is energy, without it, there would be no “dark energy” at all. Mass equals energy at a large scale — and that’s the only matter that matters. There are, indeed, some special relativities to the photon: it is related to any familiar photons it can reach upon a single leap — that’s the only way how the photon’s “Δs² = 0” can be sound —, sounds familiar? What would happen if all the photons of the universe decided to go on a strike? Imagine all the assets of the universe completely frozen at one time — what could happen? Nothing, obviously. Would you get older without updating yourself’s mass and energy all the time? No? Why not? Because that’s what time really is — it is the change itself. In nature, nothing is created, nothing is lost, everything is transformed. Time does not pass — it happens. Quite obvious, right? That’s exactly how the photon does not experience time passing (i.e., Δτ² = 0) — ‘cause it is ticking the universe’s updating… all the time… The "ticker" got ticked for "speeding" — refused to pay due to lack of due process — and lost its license after the time due. Uncertainty is only a principle to whom momentum is not a moment. The mathematics of the theory (i.e., “c=0/0”) is not competent to forbid the physical ontology of the photon’s own point of view — you don’t need any “dark logic” to understand it.