Table 3 in Growth and grazing of the chlorarachniophyte Bigelowiella natans (Chlorarachniophyceae) on the marine cyanobacterium Synechococcus

Table 3. Comparison of ingestion rates and carbon acquisition of mixotrophic and heterotrophic nanoflagellates on diverse Synechococcus strains in the literature. NM, nutrition mode; ESD, estimated spherical diameter (μm); BC, body carbon (pg C cell –1); T, temperature (°C); LI, light intensity (µmol photons m –2 s –1); Nut, nutrient condition; IR, ingestion rates (cells predator –1 h –1) are corrected to 20°C using Q = 2.8 (Hansen et al. 1997); CR, clearance rate (nl predator –1 h –1); CA, 10 carbon acquired from prey by predator per day (pg C predator –1 d –1); % BC: acquired carbon as percentage of predator’s carbon.CHL, chlorarachniophyte; CIL, ciliate; CRY, cryptophyte; EUG, euglenophyte, HNF: heterotrophic nanoflagellate. DIN: dinoflagellate. Och: ochrophyte, RAP, raphidophyte; CM, constitutive mixotrophy; HT, heterotroph. Predator speciesTaxonNMESDBCTLINutIRCRCA% BCRef.Bigelowiella natans aCHLCM5.011.02020f/22.8197.216.61521Teleaulax amphioxeiaCRYCM5.617.02020f/20.24.62.48.62Heterosigma akashiwo*RAPCM11.01012020f/23.930018.718.53Effrenium voratumDINCM11.11882020f/25.3165.425.413.64Prorocentrum donghaienseDINCM13.22742020f/27.72,60037.013.55Eutreptiella eupharyngeaEUGCM13.61302020f/20.7129.04.43.46Heterocapsa triquetraDINCM15.03642020f/24.4NA21.15.85Alexandrium minutumDINCM16.74622020f/23.2NA15.43.35Gymnodinium impudicumDINCM17.85322020f/214.5NA94.817.85Picophagus flagellatusOchHT2.50.81915PCR-S110.82.54.75757Pseudobodo sp.HNFHT3.02.61815PCR-S113.310.919.07728Cafeteria roenbergensisHNFHT3.43.617NANA18.5NA24.07189Bodo saltansHNFHT4.47.722NANA2.0NA2.329.610Spumella sp.HNFHT5.212.517NANA48.1NA73.55879Ochromonas sp.HNFHT6.825.817NANA176NA30112019Gonimonas pacificaCRYHT7.028.32215SN0.44.62.48.611Uronema sp.CILHT11.71712015NA31.014856.733.212Oxyrrhis marina bDINHT14.51941515SN4.542.226.913.811Oxyrrhis marina bDINHT14.51942030SN8.0NA48.024.713 * The maximum value among the ingestion rates measured at given prey concentrations. a Synechococcus strain CC9311 as prey b Synechococcus strain WH8102 as prey References: 1, this study; 2, Yoo et al. (2017); 3, Jeong et al. (2010); 4, Jeong et al. (2012); 5, Jeong et al. (2005); 6, Yoo et al. (2018); 7, Guillou et al. (2001); 8, Christaki et al. (2002); 9, Boenigk et al. (2001); 10, Dolan & Simek (1998); 11, Apple et al. (2011); 12, Christaki et al. (1999); 13, Strom et al. (2012).