Comparison of classification coverage of V4 reads from fecal samples among different training sets.
收藏NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-03-07 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Comparison_of_classification_coverage_of_V4_reads_from_fecal_samples_among_different_training_sets_/183198
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
We used each of the four training sets to classify single 100 bp reads excised from environmental (uncultured) bacteria 16S rRNA gene sequence from the RDP database (DB), as well as single100 bp reads from the same region sequenced from two fecal samples: A (6,298,382 sequences) and B (3,452,321 sequences). We then computed coverage for each of the ranks: phylum, class, order, family and genus, using per-rank confidence score thresholds that would ensure an FPR of at most 5%. The highest coverage in each column is underlined.
aThe confidence score threshold for these cases was lower than that of a higher level/s, and a sequence could thus be classified at the current level but not at the higher taxonomic levels. We found that the classification of such sequences is associated with a high error rate and our recommendation is to exclude them. We have therefore adjusted coverage accordingly.
创建时间:
2013-01-07



