Dataset: Mindfulness and Well-Being

<b>A manuscript using this dataset is under a journal review.</b><b><br></b><b>Abstract:</b>The attention towards the phenomenon of mindfulness has been growing in recent years. Rapidly accumulating evidence suggests that mindfulness is closely related to some aspects of well-being. This study contributes to a better understanding of the relationship between mindfulness and two well-being indicators (subjective and psychological well-being). Specifically, the results from a time-lagged panel data of employed individuals (N = 240) provide support for the differential relationships between two measures of dispositional mindfulness (MAAS and FFMQ) and two types of well-being – subjective and psychological well-being via resilience. Theoretical and practical implications of these results are discussed. <b>Variable description:</b>maas is Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS; Brown &amp; Ryan, 2003) consisting of 15 items (Cronbach’s alpha = .84).ffmq is Five Facet Mindfulness questionnaire (FFMQ; Baer, Smith, Hopkins, Krietemeyer, &amp; Toney, 2006) consisting of 38 items (Cronbach’s alpha = .91).resilience is Smith et al. (2008) scale consisting of 6 items (Cronbach’s alpha = .77).swbt1 and swb t2 is subjective well-being measured at T1 and T2 using Lyubomirsky and Lepper's (1999) scale consisting of 4 items (Cronbach’s alpha (T1/T2) = .85/.87).pwbt1 and pwb t2 is psychological well-being measured at T1 and T2 using Diener et al.'s (2010) scale consisting of 8 items (Cronbach’s alpha (T1/T2) = .85/.89).Control variables included age, gender (1 = Male), and neuroticism. Neuroticism was measured using John and Srivastava’s (1999) scale consisting of 8 items (Cronbach’s alpha = .88). <br><b>Participants:</b>Data was collected from full-time and part-time employees located in the United States registered on an online survey platform Prolific.使用本数据集的研究论文目前处于期刊审稿阶段。 **摘要：** 近年来，正念现象受到的学术关注度持续攀升。日益积累的实证证据表明，正念与幸福感的多个维度存在紧密关联。本研究旨在进一步厘清正念与两类幸福感指标（主观幸福感与心理幸福感）之间的关系。具体而言，针对在职群体的时滞面板数据（有效样本量N=240）的分析结果证实，两种特质正念测量工具——正念注意觉知量表（Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, MAAS）与五因素正念问卷（Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire, FFMQ）与两类幸福感（主观幸福感、心理幸福感）之间通过韧性（resilience）形成了差异化关联。本研究还对上述结果的理论与实践启示进行了讨论。 **变量说明：** maas为正念注意觉知量表（Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, MAAS；Brown与Ryan, 2003），共包含15个条目，克朗巴哈α系数为0.84。ffmq为五因素正念问卷（Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire, FFMQ；Baer、Smith、Hopkins、Krietemeyer与Toney, 2006），共包含38个条目，克朗巴哈α系数为0.91。resilience为Smith等人（2008）编制的量表，共包含6个条目，克朗巴哈α系数为0.77。swbt1与swb t2分别为T1时点与T2时点的主观幸福感，采用Lyubomirsky与Lepper（1999）编制的量表进行测量，该量表包含4个条目，T1与T2时点的克朗巴哈α系数分别为0.85与0.87。pwbt1与pwb t2分别为T1时点与T2时点的心理幸福感，采用Diener等人（2010）编制的量表进行测量，该量表包含8个条目，T1与T2时点的克朗巴哈α系数分别为0.85与0.89。控制变量包括年龄、性别（1=男性）以及神经质（neuroticism）。神经质采用John与Srivastava（1999）编制的量表进行测量，共包含8个条目，克朗巴哈α系数为0.88。 **研究对象：** 数据来源于美国境内注册于在线调查平台Prolific的全职与兼职雇员。