Supplementary materials to: Could your candidate shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose votes? Identifying “lines in the sand” in ingroup candidate transgressions

Supplementary materials to: Howard, K. A., Cervone, D., & Motyl, M. (2022). Could your candidate shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose votes? Identifying “lines in the sand” in ingroup candidate transgressions. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 10(1), 272–287. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.5453 JSPP Lines in the Sand ESM Pilot Study Materials: This document contains a description of the Pilot Study used to create the Transgression Severity Scale in the Main Manuscript. It describes the participants who participated in the pilot, as well as the rating and scoring procedure used to select items for the TSS scale. It also contains all instructions, descriptions, and items that participants encountered during the pilot study. JSPP Lines in the Sand ESM Main Text Materials: This document contains all instructions, descriptions, measures, and items that participants saw, and/or completed during the main study. JSPP Lines in the Sand ESM Additional Analyses: This document displays ideological differences in severity perceptions for each of the 70 transgressions. Because some transgressions were perceived to be significantly worse by conservatives than liberals (and vice versa), we performed the same analyses as described in the main text, but only used the transgression items for which there were no ideological differences in severity. This document displays these results.