LFCT Validation Suite: Quantitative Predictions vs Observational Data (Data Runs E, F, G)
收藏资源简介:
Reproducible quantitative validation of Light Frame Cadence Theory (LFCT) against published observational data. Three independent data runs test 30 predictions derived from axioms A1–A5 with zero free parameters. Data Run E ("LFCT's Numbers vs the Sky") validates 15 predictions from the LFIS-24 derivation chain: CMB first-peak position (1.4%), peak height ratio (0.9%), damping scale (2.7%), CMB temperature (2.8%), peak spacing (2.4%), power spectrum amplitude (0.7%), Hubble constant ratio (0.2%), MOND acceleration scale (0.5%), damping ratio (1.4%), energy-density fractions (3.4%), galaxy rotation curves (SPARC RAR, R² = 0.989), and the nine-regime census. Score: 0.98. Data Run F ("LFIS-27 Predictions") validates 8 predictions from the CMB architecture volume: oscillation amplitude 28/5 (0.1%), peak spacing ratio κ_TR = 5/2 (0.7%), electroweak crossover temperature (0.4%), Sachs-Wolfe plateau shape (2.1% RMS), parity weakening, peak-2 seam correction (4.4%), balance point (0.8%), and recovery saturation parameters (forward prediction). Score: 1.00. Data Run G ("Slip, Polarisation, and Geometry") validates 7 predictions from Core Physical Derivations v1.2.0: gravitational slip η − 1 = −1/π³ (0.4σ), ISW enhancement ×1.066 (0.3σ), kSZ fσ₈ corrections at five redshifts, EE/TT normalisation 25/(8π⁶) (6.6%), EE first-peak position (1.8%), B-mode suppression BB/EE = 2/(3π⁴) (forward prediction), and CMB last-scattering radius (2.5%). Score: 0.88. Combined: 23 PASS, 2 CONSISTENT, 1 MARGINAL, 0 FAIL, 2 PREDICTION. Overall score 0.96. Observational comparisons drawn from Planck 2018, SH0ES, SPARC RAR, FIRAS, BICEP/Keck, and lattice QCD. Archive contains Python scripts, scope documents, and JSON results. Requires Python 3.8+ and NumPy.



