Replication Data for Political Cleavages and Changing Exposure to Global Warming

Why do some countries pass laws to reduce emissions that cause climate change while others do not? We theorize that climate change-related disasters cause leaders to view global warming as more proximate, but whether they have incentives to enact mitigation laws depends on their country's geographic vulnerability to future damages. We use a spatial integrated assessment model to measure global warming's local economic effects, which allows us to predict how leaders respond to disasters based on their vulnerability. An analysis of mitigation laws from 1990--2020 in 155 countries shows that only governments in locations facing the greatest future climate damage react to disasters by passing mitigation policies. Distinct from the historical North-South divide, our findings highlight a growing geographic cleavage in national responses to climate change.