Towards Fermentation as Method, Methodology and Intelligence

This research contribution introduces how fermentation has informed my newly developed methods and methodology, termed Fermethod, Fermentology and the Fermentation Intelligences Fermentillgences. It further positions fermentation as a teacher through the centring of seven fermentation intelligences, including, poly-temporalities, preserving and transforming (Fournier, 2020), agitating towards stability (Chen, 2018), interspecies kinship (Haraway, 2016), contamination (Katz, 2003, 2020; Tsing, 2015), sensorial knowing and magic + joy. Slide 1: Fermentation Intelligences Positions fermentation as a teacher through the centring of seven fermentation intelligences,including poly-temporalities, preserving and transforming (Fournier, 2020), agitating towards stability (Chen, 2018), interspecies kinship (Haraway, 2016), contamination (Katz, 2003, 2020; Tsing, 2015), sensorial knowing and magic + joy. The fermentation intelligences support the re-evaluating of deep learning intentions in research projects. Slide 2: Fermentology Describes Fermentology, a newly created methodology that functions as both a research framework and a value system. It advocates for a processual and emergent understanding of knowledge creation through prioritising, slowness, situatedness (Haraway, 2016), collaboration (Tsing, 2015), transformation (Tsing, 2015) and porosity (Katz, 2020). Aligned with a post qualitative (St Pierre, 2014, 2017, 2021; Le Grange, 2018) approach, Fermentology integrates the Vital Forces, and emphasises the importance of time, context, and relational dynamics in the creation and dissemination of knowledge. Slide 3: Fermethod Outlines the Fermethods, which build upon Colebrook (2017) and Lenz Taguchi and St.Pierre's (2017) notion of 'concept as method' and draw upon my material investigations with fermentation. I propose the following Fermethods as tools to inform the data analysis and distillation process, they are, chopping, preserving, bruising, packing, soaking and bubbling. They are informed by what Colebrook (2017) terms 'intensive concepts,' where "the concept itself operates as a method, derived directly from the problem it addresses" (p. 654), furthermore they emphasise a departure from traditional humanist and individualist research methods. Conclusion This research output not only advances conceptual approaches to methods and methodology, it also offers a tangible 'research container' to aid other researchers and academics in applying these innovative concepts. By embracing the complex and transformative nature of fermentation, this offering invites a rethinking of traditional research methodologies, promoting a more reflective, and dynamic approach to academic inquiry. References Chen, M. Y. (2018). Agitation. South Atlantic Quarterly, 117(3), 551–566. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-6942147 Colebrook, C. (2017). What Is This Thing Called Education? Qualitative Inquiry, 23(9), 649–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417725357 Escobar, A. (2020). Pluriversal Politics: The Real and the Possible. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 126, 153–156. https://doi.org/10.4000/rccs.12507 Fournier, L. (2020). Fermenting Feminism as Methodology and Metaphor. Environmental Humanities, 12(1), 88–112. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-8142220 Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press. Katz, S. (2003). The Revolution Will Not Be Microwaved | Wild Fermentation : Wild Fermentation. Wild Fermentation. https://www.wildfermentation.com/the-revolution-will-not-be-microwaved/ Katz, S. (2012). The Art of Fermentation. Chelsea Green Publishing Co. Katz, S. (2016). Wild fermentation : the flavor, nutrition, and craft of live-culture foods. Chelsea Green Publishing. Katz, S. (2020). Fermentation as metaphor. Chelsea Green Publishing. Le Grange, L. (2018). Leading article: What is (post)quanlitative research? South African Journal of Higher Education, 32(5). https://doi.org/10.20853/32-5-3161 Taguchi, H. L., & St.Pierre, E. A. (2017). Using Concept as Method in Educational and Social Science Inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(9), 643–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417732634 Tsing, A. (2015). The Mushroom At The End Of The World: On The Possibility Of Life In Capitalist Ruins. Princeton University Press. Stengers, I. (2015). In catastrophic times : resisting the coming barbarism. Open Humanities Press/Meson Press. St. Pierre, E.A. (2014). A Brief and Personal History of Post Qualitative Research: Toward “Post Inquiry.” Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30(2), 2. St. Pierre, E. A. (2017). Writing Post Qualitative Inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(9), 603–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417734567 St. Pierre, E. A. (2021). Post Qualitative Inquiry, the Refusal of Method, and the Risk of the New. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(1), 107780041986300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419863005 Van Groll, N., & Kummen, K. (2021). Troubled Pedagogies and COVID-19: Fermenting New Relationships and Practices in Early Childhood Care and Education. Journal of Childhood Studies, 46(3), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.18357/jcs463202120047