Supplementary Material for: Efficacy of penetrating canaloplasty versus trabeculectomy in patients with bilateral primary glaucoma: a self-control study

Introduction: Schlemm's canal-based minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGSs) are gaining increasing recognition and acceptance, but majority of these MIGSs are recommended in eyes with open angle. Bleb-independent penetrating canaloplasty (PCP) restores physiological aqueous outflow in eyes with both open and closed angles. We aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and postoperative management of penetrating canaloplasty versus trabeculectomy in patients with bilateral primary glaucoma. Methods: This study is prospective self-control case series in a tertiary hospital in China. A total of 54 eyes from 27 patients with bilateral primary open angle glaucoma (n=18) or primary angle-closure glaucoma (n=9) were included. Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (TRAB) was performed in one eye, while PCP was performed in the contralateral fellow eye. Intraocular pressure (IOP), number of glaucoma medications, surgery-related complications and postoperative interventions were compared between groups. Complete (without medication) and qualified success (with/without medication) were defined as IOP ≤21 mmHg and ≥20% IOP reduction. Results: Mean IOP decreased from 32.5±8.87mmHg on 2.3±1.43 medications at baseline to 14.6±4.41mmHg on 0.20±0.58 medications at 12 months in TRAB group (both p25mmHg, 22.2%) and microhyphaema (22.2%) were the most common complications for PCP, while hypotony (14.8%) and wound leakage (11.1%) were frequently seen after TRAB. Conclusion: Penetrating canaloplasty demonstrates comparable IOP-lowering effect with trabeculectomy in eyes with primary glaucoma, but with less post-operative complications and interventions.