Data from: Measuring motivation for forage in feedlot cattle fed a high-concentrate diet using a short-term thwarting test
收藏DataCite Commons2025-04-01 更新2025-04-09 收录
下载链接:
https://datadryad.org/dataset/doi:10.25338/B8264P
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
A thwarting test, where animals are able to interact with feed but not
consume it, can be used to measure how valued the resource is. It is
expected that feedlot cattle will be motivated to access additional
roughage because of its potential to alleviate symptoms of ruminal
acidosis caused by high-concentrate rations. The objective of this study
was to measure how motivated cattle fed a high-concentrate diet are to
access additional forage, when offered it freely for 8 short exposures
before being prevented from consuming the resource, in a thwarting test.
Eighteen animals, fed a finishing ration ad-libitum, were offered a small
amount of either beardless wheat hay (WH; n=9) or their primary diet (TMR;
n=9) in a plastic bin twice daily for a maximum of 1 h over 4 d (exposures
1-8). Then on the 5th day (thwarting test), animals were given access to
but prevented from consuming their treatment diet by covering it with wire
for 30 min. There was no evidence of treatment differences detected during
the thwarting test. This may indicate there was adequate roughage in the
primary diet to satisfy motivation for thwarted WH. Animals were quick to
approach the treatments (average latency less than 30 s) during the test,
possibly indicating motivation to access both. Unlike the thwarting test,
behavioural responses to the treatments differed in the exposures, when
cattle showed more interest in the TMR than the WH. Interacting with the
bin by moving it with their muzzles was observed more often for TMR
animals than WH animals in exposures 7 and 8 (P=0.07 and 0.04,
respectively). There was no evidence that latency to approach the bin
differed by treatment or exposure (P>0.1). These findings provide
some evidence in support the theory that animals will seek out a
high-energy diet such as the TMR, because it is more calorically-dense,
and likely more palatable. However, these data do not support the
hypothesis that finishing cattle will be more motivated to access WH than
TMR when thwarted from doing so.
提供机构:
Dryad
创建时间:
2023-05-04



