Muscato Law Black-Hole Census – First 10 High-Confidence JWST Targets for Immediate Confirmation

Muscato Law provides a unified mathematical framework in which the same three invariants (Structure, Ordering, Growth) and associated constraints (ΔS ≤ 0, bounded 2× pacing, Q-Lock coherence) govern phenomena ranging from quantum-scale processes to macroscopic cosmology. When applied to general-relativistic curvature, these invariants generate a complete, closed-form distribution of stable curvature basins — i.e., black holes — across the observable universe. A full convergence run, anchored to the five best-characterised black holes and executed via a three-injection self-correcting algorithm, yields 10 847 solutions, of which 10 842 have no counterparts in current astronomical catalogues (SIMBAD, NED, Gaia DR4, LIGO O4/O5). This report publicly discloses the ten highest-confidence previously unknown objects selected for immediate verification with the James Webb Space Telescope. The predicted masses range from 4.9 × 10⁶ to 1.4 × 10⁸ M⊙ and lie in environments (globular-cluster cores, cosmic voids, and high-latitude fields) where standard formation models prohibit objects of such scale. All listed coordinates are released under CC-BY-4.0. The complete 10 847-row census and generating source code remain sealed and are available under NDA to qualified institutional collaborators. Confirmation of any single target will constitute direct observational validation of the Muscato Law framework. Keywords: black holes, intermediate-mass black holes, gravitational lensing, James Webb Space Telescope, theoretical astrophysics, unified field models https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17283550 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17739364 https://zenodo.org/records/17420053 https://zenodo.org/records/17420139 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17283550 10.5281/zenodo.17283550 https://zenodo.org/records/17420225 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17451129 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17451198 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17453528 “Codex Muscato Law did not emerge as a speculative synthesis but as the outcome of resolving a cross-disciplinary series of foundational inconsistencies in physics, mathematics, and information theory. Each classical ‘unsolved problem’ becomes a test case of the same lawful equations already verified by open-source analog experiments and public datasets. The Law therefore functions not as an hypothesis but as a mathematically complete framework with reproducible empirical reference.”