FE models related to report "Deciding where to verify the fatigue resistance of an orthotropic steel bridge deck"

FE models related to the master thesis with the name: Deciding where to verify the fatigue resistance of an orthotropic steel bridge deck<br>This contains a total of 11 different FE model which all model the behaviour of a single bridge.4 models are made of 2D elements and do not contain any weld details. The difference is the mesh refinement applied at the welds at the connection between the trough webs and the deck plate4 models are made of 2D elements and do contain weld details according to the Dutch regulations (ROK 2.0). The weld details are at the point for which the model is made. At this point the maximum stress interval is determined. The different points are point: A, B, 1, 2. The locations of this point can be found in the master thesis these model were generated for. Or, by opening the models and observing the location of the mesh refinement.2 models are made of 1D ellements. They are used to research the difference between the choice of modelling of the cross section of the stiffeners. Either "open" or "closed"1 1D models is used the research the response of the main girders due to the loads applied on them by the cross beams<br>

本数据集包含与题为《正交异性钢桥面板抗疲劳验证点位决策》的硕士学位论文相关的有限元（Finite Element, FE）模型，共计11个针对同一座桥梁力学行为建模的不同有限元模型，具体分类如下：
1. 4个采用二维单元建模的模型，未包含任何焊接细节，模型间的唯一差异在于纵肋腹板与桥面板连接处焊缝区域所应用的网格细化方案不同。
2. 4个采用二维单元建模的模型，包含符合荷兰规范（ROK 2.0）的焊接细节。焊接细节设置于该模型预设的研究点位，用于确定该点位的最大应力幅。研究点位分为A、B、1、2四处，其具体位置可查阅该模型所属的硕士学位论文，或通过打开模型查看网格细化区域的位置获取。
3. 2个采用一维单元建模的模型，用于对比加劲肋截面采用“开口型”与“闭口型”两种建模方式的差异。
4. 1个采用一维单元建模的模型，用于研究横梁在主梁上施加荷载后引发的主梁响应。