Predictors of cochlear implantation outcomes (Jafari et al., 2024)

<b>Purpose: </b>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), electric compound action potential (eCAP), and electric auditory brainstem response (eABR) are among the routine assessments performed before and/or after cochlear implantation. The objective of this review was to systematically summarize and critically appraise existing evidence of the prognostic value of eCAP, eABR, and MRI for predicting post–cochlear implant (CI) speech perception outcomes in children, with a particular focus on the lesion site.<b>Method: </b>The present systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 statement. Three electronic databases (ProQuest, PubMed, and Scopus) were searched with no restrictions on language, publication status, or year of publication. Studies on children identified with sensorineural hearing loss, auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder, cochlear nerve deficiency, or cochleovestibular nerve abnormalities reporting the relevance of eCAP, eABR, and/or MRI results to CI speech perception outcomes were included. The literature search yielded 1,887 publications. Methodological quality and strength of evidence were assessed by the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool, respectively.<b>Results: </b>Of the 25 included studies, the relevance of eCAP, eABR, and/or MRI findings to post-CI speech perception outcomes was reported in 10, 11, and 11 studies, respectively. The studies were strongly in support of the prognostic value of eABR and MRI for CI outcomes. However, the relevance of eCAP findings to speech perception outcomes was uncertain.<b>Conclusion: </b>Despite the promising findings, caution is warranted in interpreting them due to the observational and retrospective design of the included studies, as well as the heterogeneity of the population and the limited control of confounding factors within these studies.<b>Supplemental Material S1.</b> Characteristics of studies on the prognostic value of NRT and eCAP for CI outcomes.<b>Supplemental Material S2.</b> Characteristics of studies on the prognostic value of eABR for CI outcomes.<b>Supplemental Material S3.</b> Characteristics of studies on the prognostic value of MRI findings for CI outcomes.Jafari, Z., Fitzpatrick, E. M., Schramm, D. R., Rouillon, I., &amp; Koravand, A. (2024). Prognostic value of electrophysiological and MRI findings for pediatric cochlear implant outcomes: A systematic review. <i>American Journal of Audiology</i><i>, 33</i>(3), 1023–1040. https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJA-23-00272