five

Comparison of Sharp Dissection, Electrocautery, and Ultrasonic Activated Scalpel with Regard to Endothelial Damage, Preparation Time, and Postoperative Bleeding During Radial Artery Harvesting

收藏
Figshare2019-12-01 更新2026-04-29 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Comparison_of_Sharp_Dissection_Electrocautery_and_Ultrasonic_Activated_Scalpel_with_Regard_to_Endothelial_Damage_Preparation_Time_and_Postoperative_Bleeding_During_Radial_Artery_Harvesting/11314352
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
Abstract Objective: To examine the effects of classical technique, electrocautery, and ultrasonic dissection on endothelial integrity, function, and preparation time for harvesting the radial artery (RA) during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: Forty-five patients who underwent isolated CABG and whose RA was suitable for use were studied and divided into three groups: Group 1, classical method (using sharp dissection); Group 2, electrocautery; and Group 3, ultrasonic cautery. Levels of prostacyclin and nitric oxide derivatives were examined biochemically; vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) and endothelial nitric oxide synthetase (eNOS) values were assessed using immunohistochemical staining. RA preparation time, RA length/harvesting time ratio, and drainage amounts at the site of RA removal were compared. Results: Differences in RA preparation time (Group 1: 25±6 min, Group 2: 18±3 min, Group 3: 16±3 min, P
创建时间:
2019-12-01
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务