Matching Method to Mind: Personality-Decision Style Profiles and Differential Responsiveness to Defocusing Interventions
收藏Figshare2025-11-17 更新2026-04-28 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Matching_Method_to_Mind_Personality-Decision_Style_Profiles_and_Differential_Responsiveness_to_Defocusing_Interventions/30634262
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
This dataset contains experimental data from a study examining how defocusing interventions reduce the focusing illusion—a cognitive bias where individuals disproportionately emphasize salient negative events (e.g., social blunders) when predicting social repercussions, contributing to social anxiety. You may open the .omv file in Jamovi (open source software). The first author being a student and less proficiency in programming, preferred to use Jamovi over RStudio (Author 2 used this to confirm the analysis).Study OverviewNinety-seven college students (ages 18-25) participated in a randomized between-subjects experimental design. Participants evaluated eight social blunder scenarios, rating anticipated embarrassment, shame, perceived social costs, and fear of negative judgment under control or defocusing intervention conditions.Key FindingsDefocusing interventions significantly reduced perceived negative social costs (p = .010, d = 0.54) and negative judgment expectations (p = .004, d = 0.61). Cluster analysis identified three personality-decision style profiles withdifferential intervention responsiveness. Analysts (high conscientiousness) showed largest benefits for concrete social cost reduction (d = 0.85); Explorers (high openness/extraversion) for reducing judgment-related anxiety (d = 0.96). Agreeableness moderated effects across profiles.Dataset ContentsSample size: N = 97Study design: Between-subjects experimental designAge range: 18-25 yearsPopulation: College studentsCountry: IndiaIRB approval: YesData de-identification: CompleteOpen data: YesGroup 1= Control, 2=ExperimentalBig Five personality traits and decision-making styles, social anxiety symptoms (SPIN), outcome measures, clustering analysis results (K-means and Latent Profile Analysis validation), and descriptive statistics bycondition and profile.More questions about this research may be directed to Dr Koteshwar Ramesh Rakesh, Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Delhi-NCR campus, Ghaziabad – 201003, Uttar Pradesh, India. email: rakeshkr288@gmail.com.
创建时间:
2025-11-17



