five

Data Sheet 1_Comparative effectiveness of two first-line, ICI-based regimens for advanced HCC: a target trial emulation using an electronic medical record network.docx

收藏
NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-05-10 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_Sheet_1_Comparative_effectiveness_of_two_first-line_ICI-based_regimens_for_advanced_HCC_a_target_trial_emulation_using_an_electronic_medical_record_network_docx/31122718
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
IntroductionHead-to-head comparative evidence of the relative efficacies of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo+Bev) and tremelimumab plus durvalumab (Treme+Dur) as first-line therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains limited. Thus, in the present study, we compared the real-world efficacy and safety of these two modalities using a target trial emulation approach. MethodsUsing the TriNetX Research Network, we identified adults (≥20 years) with HCC (ICD-10 C22.0) who initiated first-line Atezo+Bev or Treme+Dur (November 2022– November 2024). Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to balance the baseline characteristics. The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included 1- or 2-year OS and organ-specific immune-related adverse events (irAEs) within 12 months, based on pre-specified ICD-10 definitions. ResultsAfter matching, 640 patients were included in each group. Residual imbalance persisted in hepatic reserve markers (albumin, international normalized ratio, and platelet count; standardized mean differences >0.1). One-year OS was numerically higher in the Atezo+Bev group than in the Treme+Dur group (61% vs 55%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.806; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.665–0.976; p = 0.027). Two-year OS (HR, 0.864; 95% CI, 0.723–1.031; p = 0.105) and overall OS showed no significant differences (median: 19.4 vs 19.0 months [591 vs 578 days]; HR, 0.886; 95% CI, 0.743–1.057; p = 0.179). Most irAEs were similar; however, the time-to-first hepatic irAEs favored Atezo+Bev (HR, 0.678; 95% CI, 0.487–0.943; p = 0.020). Notably, respiratory irAEs occurred significantly earlier in the Treme+Dur group than in the Atezo+Bev group (mean onset: 2.4 vs 3.2 days; p = 0.031). ConclusionsIn this real-world target trial emulation, Atezo+Bev and Treme+Dur demonstrated broadly comparable long-term OS rates when used as first-line therapies for HCC. While baseline hepatic reserve plays an important role, the treatment regimen itself may contribute to earlier onset of hepatic and respiratory irAE. Careful monitoring for early-onset hepatic dysfunction and respiratory irAEs may be warranted in patients treated with Treme+Dur combination therapy.
创建时间:
2026-01-22
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务