Additional file 3 of Multi-omics insights into the positive role of strigolactone perception in barley drought response

Additional file 3: Supplemental Data 2. Table S2a. List of up-regulated proteins in the WT_D vs WT_C comparison (log2FC ≥ 0.58, q-value ≤ 0.05). Table S2b. List of down-regulated proteins in the WT_D vs WT_C comparison (log2FC ≤ -0.58, q-value ≤ 0.05). Table S2c. List of up-regulated proteins in the hvd14_D vs hvd14_C comparison (log2FC ≥ 0.58, q-value ≤ 0.05). Table S2d. List of down-regulated proteins in the hvd14_D vs hvd14_C comparison (log2FC ≤ -0.58, q-value ≤ 0.05). Table S2e. List of proteins up-regulated by drought, only in WT (log2FC ≥ 0.58, q-value ≤ 0.05) - WT Drought Resposne Specific (WT DRS) proteins. Table S2f. List of proteins down-regulated by drought, only in WT (log2FC ≤ 0.58, q-value ≤ 0.05) - WT Drought Resposne Specific (WT DRS) proteins. Table S2g. List of proteins up-regulated by drought, only in hvd14 (log2FC ≥ 0.58, q-value ≤ 0.05) - hvd14 Drought Resposne Specific (hvd14 DRS) proteins. Table S2h. List of proteins down-regulated by drought, only in hvd14 (log2FC ≤ 0.58, q-value ≤ 0.05) - hvd14 Drought Resposne Specific (hvd14 DRS) proteins. Table S2i. List of proteins up-regulated by drought, in both genotypes: WT and hvd14 (log2FC ≥ 0.58, q-value ≤ 0.05). Table S2j. List of proteins down-regulated by drought, in both genotypes: WT and hvd14 (log2FC ≥ 0.58, q-value ≤ 0.05).