Effectiveness of Brain Targeted Teaching vs Content and Language Integrated Learning approach for Teaching Prose

This research article aims to assess the efficacy of two teaching approaches, namely "Brain Targeted Teaching" (BTT) and "Content and Language Integrated Learning" (CLIL), in the context of English Language Teaching. By analyzing scientific evidence, the article explores which method better serves the needs of students. The study employed an experimental research design using a factorial analysis to investigate the research problem. The sample size was determined using the Cochran formula, and a simple random sampling technique was utilized. A total of 40 participants received the teaching treatment for prose. Statistical analysis was conducted using "IBM SPSS GradPack Premium Version 29 Licensed." The findings from the multivariate analysis suggest that BTT was a significantly more effective method for teaching prose compared to CLIL. Notably, factors such as gender did not have a significant impact on the results when considering the Immediate Achievement Test scores as co-variates.<b></b>