SUPPLEMENT TO "EAST BODISH REVISITED": DATA
收藏NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-05-02 收录
下载链接:
https://zenodo.org/record/6559622
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
This dataset is the supplement to the publication "East Bodish Revisited".
BULLETIN OF TIBETOLOGY, Vol 54 No 1 2023
BODIC LINGUISTICS
This issue of the Bulletin of Tibetology, guest-edited by Prof. George van Driem, is devoted chiefly to linguistics, but more especially to the field of Tibetology in its quintessence. The contributions are devoted not just to Sikkim and the languages of Sikkim, but together they present the most substantive new collection of studies on Bodish languages and on Bodic as a linguistic subgroup. In detailing the most recent linguistic insights and clarifying the relationship between Tibetan, Drenjongke and Dzongkha, this issue of the Bulletin updates our understanding of the Bodish languages. At a higher taxonomic level in the family tree, a new understanding is also presented of Bodic as comprising an important branch within the Trans-Himalayan language family.
CONTENTS
George van Driem Editorial
George van Driem The Sociolinguistic Situation of Sikkim’s Indigenous Languages and the Origins of the Peoples of Sikkim
Timotheus A. Bodt East Bodish Revisited
Nathan W. Hill A Tibetan Passive Construction in the Old Tibetan Rāmāyaṇa
Alex McKay Book Review: Marching into View: The Tibetan Army in Historic Photographs (1895–1959), Alice Travers, 2022
https://files.namgyalinstitutesikkim.org/Bulletin%20Vol%2054%20No%201%202023.pdf
Back issues of the Bulletin of Tibetology can be downloaded here: https://namgyalinstitutesikkim.org/bulletin/
This dataset contains all the cognate sets in the paper, with the same sequential numbering as in the paper. This provides for an easy cross-reference between this paper and the supplement. In addition to the information provided in the individual cognate sets in this paper, the cognate sets in the supplement contain important additional information. Whereas the cognate sets in this paper only have a reference to the source code in Table 1 when the source for an individual form is distinct from the main source consulted for each linguistic variety, the cognate sets in the supplement have a more specific reference to the page numbers as well. This makes it easier for people with no or limited knowledge of the source languages (in particular, Dzongkha and Chinese) of some of the source materials to cross-check the referenced forms in their original sources: This also contributes to greater transparency and accountability regarding the use of secondary sources. The cognate sets in the supplement also contain more forms in individual linguistic varieties, for example, forms that for some reason (e.g., borrowing, or lexical innovation) are not illustrative for the sound correspondence that the cognate set is deemed to exemplify, likely cognate forms in other languages, semantic content of the form in the specific variety if this differs from the semantic content of the concept it is cognate with, and other etymological notes and remarks of interest. The abbreviations for the data sources are
abbr.
variety
source
source (full)
DD
Dakpa-Dzala
DkW
Dakpa Wénlàng
Lù02
Lù 2002
DkM
Dakpa Mámǎ
Lù02
Lù 2002
Lù86
Lù 1986
DkB
Dakpa Bāngjīn
Lù02
Lù 2002
Dz
Dzalakha
DDC17
DDC 2017
TAB
own data
vD07
van Driem 2007b
DkT
Dakpa Tawang
W02
Wangchu 2002
TAB
own data
DkD
Dakpa Dáwàng
Lù02
Lù 2002
DkC
Dakpa Cuònà
Y92
Yìxī 1992
OEB
Other East Bodish
Kt
Kurtöp
KD16
Hyslop et al. 2016
KG17
Hyslop 2017
MM94
Michailovsky and Mazaudon 1994
Bt
Bumthang
vD15
van Driem 2015
MM94
Michailovsky and Mazaudon 1994
DDC18
Dzongkha Development Commission 2018
IT21
Ikeda 2021b
BtU
Bumthang Ura
DDC18
Dzongkha Development Commission 2018
BtC
Bumthang Chume
DDC18
Dzongkha Development Commission 2018
Kh
Khengkha
YA96
Yangzom and Arkesteijn 1996
IT21
Ikeda 2021b
TAB
own data
Md
(Upper) Mangdep
B16
Bosch 2016
Other languages
Tib
Tibetan
(various)
Chi
Chinese
BS
Baxter and Sagart 2014
Tsh
Tshangla
DDC18a
Dzongkha Development Commission 2018a
TAB
own data
Bur
Burmese
mainly Hill 2019
References:
Baxter, William H. & Laurent Sagart. 2014. Old Chinese: a new reconstruction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bosch, André. 2016. Language contact in Upper Mangdep: a comparative grammar of verbal constructions. BA thesis. University of Sydney: Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences.
DDC (Dzongkha Development Commission). rdzoṅ-kha daṅ dza-la-kha iṅ-liś śan-sbyar tshig-gi mdzod [Dzongkha-Dzalakha-English Lexicon]. Thimphu: Dzongkha Development Commission.
—— 2018. bum-thaṅ-kha rdzoṅ-kha iṅ-liś śan-sbyar miṅ-mdzod [Bumthang-Dzongkha-English Lexicon]. Thimphu: Dzongkha Development Commission.
—— 2018a. tshangs-la-lo – rdzoṅ-kha – iṅ-liś skad gsum śan-sbyar miṅ-mdzod tshaṅs-lhaḥi sgra-dbyaṅs [Melody of Brahma: Tshangla – Dzongkha – English trilingual lexicon]. Thimphu: Dzongkha Development Commission.
van Driem, George. 2007b. Dzala and Dakpa form a coherent subgroup within East Bodish, and some related thoughts. Linguistics of the Himalayas and beyond: 71–85.
—— 2015. Synoptic grammar of the Bumthang language. Himalayan Linguistics Archive 6 (2015), 1–77.
Hill, Nathan W. 2019. The Historical Phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hyslop, Gwendolyn. 2017. A grammar of Kurtöp. Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region 18. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
Hyslop, Gwendolyn, Karma Tshering, Kuenga Lhendrup, and Pema Chhophyel. 2016. Kurtöp/English/Dzongkha Dictionary (draft).
Ikeda, Takumi. 2021b. Basic Vocabulary of Khengkha with English-Chinese Index Ver. 6 (2021/02/28). In, Yasuhiko Nagano and Takumi Ikeda (eds.) Grammatical Phenomena of Sino-Tibetan Languages 4: Link languages and archetypes in Tibeto-Burman: 121–241.
Lù, Shàozūn 陆绍尊. 1986.《错那门巴语简志》Cuònà Ménbāyǔ Jiǎnzhì [Brief description of the Cuona Menba language]. 北京: 民族出版社出版发 行 Běijīng: Mínzú chūbǎn shè [Peking: Nationalities Press].
—— 2002.《门巴语方言研究》Ménbā yǔ fāngyán yánjiū [A study of the Menba dialect]. 中国少数民族语言方言研究丛书 Zhōngguó shào shù mínzú yǔyán fāngyán yánjiū cóngshū [Chinese Minority Language Dialect Research Series]). 北京: 民族出版社 Běijīng: Mínzú chūbǎn shè [Peking: Nationalities Press].
Michailovsky, Boyd and Martine Mazaudon. 1994. Preliminary notes on the languages of the Bumthang group. In, Per Kvaerne (ed.) Tibetan Studies, Proceedings of the 6th seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies. Fagernes: The institute for comparative research in human culture, pp. 545–557.
Wangchu, Lhama. 2002. An introduction to Tawang Monpa language. Itanagar: Directorate of Research, Department of Cultural Affairs, Government of Arunachal Pradesh.
Yangzom, Deki and Marlen Arkesteijn. 1996. Khengkha Lessonbook. Thimphu: SNV Bhutan.
Yìxī 益西 [Ye-śes]. 1992.《试论措那门巴话与藏语关系》Shì lùn Cuònà Ménbā huà yǔ Zàng yǔ guānxì [On the relationship between the Cuònà Ménbā dialect and the Tibetan language]. 西藏研究 1992年, 3期: 108–122 Xīzàng Yánjiū 1992 nián, 3 qī: 108–122 [Tibet Studies 1992, Issue 3: 108–122].
创建时间:
2024-12-04



