Participants' rankings of four alternatives during a citizens' summit. The participants ranked the alternatives twice (ranking1 and ranking 2). In each file the rankings of a group of participants is
Summary of effect sizes (ES) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of the investigated sample (n = 140) subdivided into condition (EG and PE group) and sex (boys and girls) and comparison of intergro
Data and R code to reproduce the figures in our EJN technical spotlight: Modern graphical methods to compare two groups of observationsGuillaume A. Rousselet, Cyril R. Pernet, Rand R. WilcoxEuropea