five

The Cosmological Constant Correction: From Empirical Mismatch to First-Principles Derivation

收藏
Zenodo2026-06-23 更新2026-06-05 收录
下载链接:
https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.20438505
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
This paper presents the complete derivation of the cosmological constant in the canvas model, tracing its evolution from an initial empirical mismatch through to a first-principles prediction. The derivation proceeds in four stages. First, baseline subtraction: the uniform vacuum energy of the canvas fields does not gravitate because the uniform lattice spacing has zero Laplacian. This eliminates the 10^{120} discrepancy that plagues conventional quantum field theory. Second, the residual cosmological constant arises from the imperfect cancellation of space and time wave amplitudes, limited by the finite information capacity of the observable universe. The minimum resolvable fractional difference is \epsilon = 1/I_{\text{max}}, where I_{\text{max}} = 4\pi R_H^2/\ell_P^2 \sim 10^{122}. Third, a crucial factor of 1/2 enters from the causal structure of de Sitter spacetime. Only the causally accessible hemisphere of the cosmic horizon can contribute to observable information. The observer's past light cone intersects the future event horizon on a hemisphere of area 2\pi R_H^2, not the full sphere. Fourth, the geometric subspace dimensions of the canvas model determine the exact coefficient. The space fields occupy a 3D subspace; the time field occupies a 1D subspace. The fraction of vacuum energy surviving baseline subtraction is \Omega_\Lambda^{(0)} = 3/(3+\sqrt{2}), where \sqrt{2} is the peak-to-RMS conversion factor for the time wave. A small correction from the fundamental coupling \alpha_0 = 1/\ln(R_H/\ell_P) \approx 1/140 accounts for the irreducible measurement uncertainty in the baseline subtraction itself. The complete prediction is: \boxed{\Omega_\Lambda = \frac{3}{3+\sqrt{2}} \cdot (1+\alpha_0) \approx 0.685} The observed value from Planck 2020 is \Omega_\Lambda = 0.685 \pm 0.007. Agreement within 0.08\%. Why this matters: No observational inputs are used beyond the cosmological boundary condition H_0, which sets the horizon radius R_H = c/H_0. The cosmological constant is a prediction of the canvas model, not a free parameter. The coincidence problem is resolved because both \rho_\Lambda and \rho_{\text{matter}} scale as 1/R_H^2. Their ratio is determined by geometry, not by temporal coincidence. A historical note: The \pi that was removed from the cosmological constant equation found its proper home in the ratio c_{\text{eff}}/d_{\text{eff}} = \pi/2, which determines the waveform asymmetry that underlies the baryon asymmetry, the arrow of time, and the CP-violating phases in the CKM and PMNS matrices. This \pi/2 ratio is the central falsifiable prediction of the canvas model. Keywords: cosmological constant, dark energy, baseline subtraction, causal projection, canvas model, \Omega_\Lambda, information bound, waveform asymmetry, fundamental coupling, de Sitter spacetime
提供机构:
Zenodo
创建时间:
2026-05-29
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务