Additional file 6 of Antioxidant potential of Pediococcus pentosaceus strains from the sow milk bacterial collection in weaned piglets

Additional file 6: Figure S9. (a) Alpha diversity comparisons of the gut microbiomes including Ace, Chao, Sobs index, Shannon index, Shannoneven index, Simpson index, Simpsoneven index and Faith's phylogenetic diversity index which were analyzed using a Kruskal-Wallis H test and Tukey-Kramer post hoc test with 95% confidence level. Data are the mean ± s.d (n = 7). ns, no significant differences. (b) Rarefaction curves for Shannon indices at the genus level in the colon contents. Figure S10. (a) Bar charts of relative abundance at the family level in the control and treated groups. (b) Comparison of microbial genera between the high dose group and control. (c) Comparison of microbial families between high dose group and control. Significantly differentially abundant taxa were identified by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. Figure S11. (a) Linear discriminant analysis score (log10) with a threshold value of 4 from phylum to genus level. (b) Differences in relative abundance of the variable genera in the colonic microbiota among three group. Each data represented the mean and SEM of relative abundance of each genus (n = 7). One-way analysis of variance and Duncan’s multiple comparison test to determine the statistical. Different letters in the same graph indicate significant statistical differences (p < 0.05).

附加文件 6：图 S9. (a) 通过 Kruskal-Wallis H 检验和 Tukey-Kramer 后续检验分析，对包括Ace、Chao、Sobs 指数、Shannon 指数、Shannoneven 指数、Simpson 指数、Simpsoneven 指数和 Faith 的系统发育多样性指数在内的肠道微生物群α多样性进行比较，置信水平为95%。数据为平均值 ± 标准差（n = 7）。ns，无显著差异。(b) 在结肠内容物中，基于属水平的 Shannon 指数的稀疏曲线。图 S10. (a) 对照组和处理组在家族水平上的相对丰度条形图。(b) 高剂量组与对照组之间微生物属的比较。(c) 高剂量组与对照组之间微生物家族的比较。通过 Wilcoxon 秩和检验确定显著差异丰度的类群。*p < 0.05；**p < 0.01。图 S11. (a) 从门到属级别的线性判别分析得分（log10），阈值值为4。(b) 在三个组别中，结肠微生物群中可变属的相对丰度差异。每个数据代表每个属的相对丰度的平均值和标准误（n = 7）。同一图中的不同字母表示存在显著统计学差异（p < 0.05）。