Data from: Tree growth responses to extreme drought after mechanical thinning and prescribed fire in a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest, USA

An estimated 128 M trees died during the 2012-2016 California drought,
largely in the southern Sierra Nevada Range. Prescribed burning and
mechanical thinning are widely used to reduce fuels and restore ecosystem
properties, but it is unclear if these treatments improve tree growth and
vigor during extreme drought. This study examined tree growth responses
after thinning, prescribed burning, and extreme drought at the Teakettle
Experimental Forest, a historically frequent fire mixed-conifer forest in
the southern Sierra Nevada of California, USA. Mechanical thinning (no
thin, understory thin, and overstory thin) and prescribed burning
(unburned, fall burning) were implemented in 2000-2001. Using annual
growth data from increment cores, over 10,000 mapped and measured trees,
and lidar-derived metrics of solar radiation and topographic wetness, we
had two primary questions. First, what were the growth responses to
thinning and prescribed burning treatments, and did these responses
persist during the 2012-2016 drought? Second, what tree-level attributes
and environmental conditions influenced growth responses to treatments and
drought? Thinning increased residual tree growth and that response
persisted through extreme drought 10 -15 years after treatments. Growth
responses were higher in overstory versus understory thinning, with
differences between thinning types more pronounced during drought.
Species-specific growth responses were strongest with overstory thinning,
with sugar pine (Pinus lambertiana) and incense-cedar (Calocedrus
decurrens) having higher growth responses compared to white fir (Abies
concolor) and Jeffery pine (Pinus jeffreyi). For individual trees, factors
associated with higher growth responses were declining pretreatment growth
trend, smaller tree size, and post-treatment low neighborhood basal area.
Growth responses were initially not influenced by topography, but
topographic wetness became important during extreme drought. Mechanical
thinning resulted in durable increases in residual tree growth rates
during extreme drought over a decade after thinning occurred, indicating
treatment longevity in mitigating drought stress. In contrast, tree growth
did not improve after prescribed burning, likely due to fire effects that
reduced surface fuels, but had little effect on reducing tree density.
Thinning treatments promoted durable growth responses, but focusing on
stand-level metrics may ignore important tree-level attributes such as
localized competition and topography associated with higher water
availability. Mechanical thinning was effective at improving growth in
trees that had been experiencing declining growth trends, but was less
effective in improving growth responses in large old higher ecological
importance.