Phylogeny rooting method comparison

Here we present figures from investigating the impact of different rooting methods on various SAR11 phylogenies1_Pseudomonadales_MADroot.jpg: Rooted with the MAD method, 10 isolate genomes from the order <i>Pseudomonadales</i> included.2_broadGamma_MADroot: Rooted with the MAD method, 10 isolate genomes broadly dispersed across multiple orders within the <i>Gammaproteobacteria included.</i>3_Rhodobacteraceae_MADroot: Rooted with the MAD method, 10 isolate genomes from the <i>Rhodobacteraceae</i> included.4_SAR11_midpoint_rooted_phylogeny: Rooted with the midpoint method. Only SAR11 genomes and Aegean-169 as well as SAR11 subgroup IV are included. A phylogeny with the mid-point rooting. 4_SAR11_MADroot_phylogeny: Rooted with the MAD method. Only SAR11 genomes and Aegean-169 as well as SAR11 subgroup IV are included.Also included are 4 PDFs with corresponding numbers (1-4) with trees generated and SAR11 genera indicated on the tree demonstrating genera stability across the various outgroups used. <br><br>