Supplementary data for the paper 'ChatGPT in education: Empowering educators through methods for recognition and assessment'

ChatGPT is widely used among students, a situation that challenges educators. The current paper presents two strategies that do not push educators into a defensive role but can empower them. Firstly, we show, based on statistical analysis, that ChatGPT use can be recognized from certain keywords such as ‘delves’ and ‘crucial’. This insight allows educators to detect ChatGPT-assisted work more effectively. Secondly, we illustrate that ChatGPT can be used to assess texts written by students. The latter topic was presented in two interactive workshops provided to educators and educational specialists. The results of the workshops, where prompts were tested live, indicated that ChatGPT, provided a targeted prompt is used, is good at recognizing errors in texts but not consistent in grading. Ethical and copyright concerns were raised as well in the workshops. In conclusion, the methods presented in this paper may help fortify the teaching methods of educators. The computer scripts that we used for live prompting are available and enable educators to give similar workshops

ChatGPT在学生群体中应用广泛，这一现状给教育工作者带来了诸多挑战。本文提出了两种策略，既不会迫使教育工作者陷入防御性角色，反而能够赋能其开展教学工作。其一，基于统计分析，我们发现可通过“delves”“crucial”等特定关键词识别ChatGPT的使用痕迹，这一发现可帮助教育工作者更高效地检测出由ChatGPT辅助完成的课业。其二，我们论证了可利用ChatGPT对学生撰写的文本进行评估。后者这一主题通过两场面向教育工作者与教育专业人士的交互式工作坊进行了展示。工作坊现场对提示词（prompt）进行了测试，结果显示：在使用针对性提示词的前提下，ChatGPT能够出色地识别文本中的错误，但在评分方面表现缺乏一致性。工作坊期间还引发了伦理与版权相关的讨论与担忧。综上，本文提出的方法或可助力教育工作者优化教学手段。我们用于现场提示的计算机脚本已公开可用，可供教育工作者开展同类工作坊使用。