five

Socioeconomic status and decreasing incidence of ocular injuries in Bosnia and Herzegovina

收藏
Mendeley Data2024-04-12 更新2024-06-27 收录
下载链接:
https://datadryad.org/stash/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.rn8pk0p70
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Title of Dataset: Socioeconomic Status and Decreasing Incidence of Ocular Injuries in Bosnia and Herzegovina 2. Author Information A. Principal Investigator Contact Information Name: Jasmin Zvornièanin Institution: Department of Ophthalmology, University Clinical Centre Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina Private Healthcare Institution Vase zdravlje, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina Address: Ulica dr Ibre Pašiæa bb, 75000 Tuzla Email: B. Associate or Co-investigator Contact Information Name: Edita Zvornièanin Institution: Department of Ophthalmology, University Clinical Centre Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina Private Healthcare Institution Vase zdravlje, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina Address: Ulica dr Ibre Pašiæa bb, 75000 Tuzla Email: 3. Date of data collection: First period from: 1st January 2009 to 31st December 2012 Second period from: 1st January 2017 to 31st December 2019. 4. Geographic location of data collection: Tuzla Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina 5. Information about funding sources that supported the collection of the data: No funding was received for this research. SHARING/ACCESS INFORMATION 1. Licenses/restrictions placed on the data: NONE 2. Links to publications that cite or use the data: 3. Links to other publicly accessible locations of the data: NONE. 4. Links/relationships to ancillary data sets: NONE. 5. Was data derived from another source? NO. 6. Recommended citation for this dataset: Zvornicanin, Jasmin; Zvornièanin, Edita. (2021), Data from: Socioeconomic Status and Decreasing Incidence of Ocular Injuries in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Dryad, Dataset, doi:10.5061/dryad.rn8pk0p70 DATA & FILE OVERVIEW 1. File List: SES and decreasing incidence of ocular injuries in B&H 2. Relationship between files, if important: NONE. 3. Additional related data collected that was not included in the current data package: NONE. 4. Are there multiple versions of the dataset? NO. A. If yes, name of file(s) that was updated: i. Why was the file updated? ii. When was the file updated? METHODOLOGICAL INFORMATION 1. Description of methods used for collection/generation of data: 2. Methods for processing the data: Differences between means were analysed by Student t test. The Chi-square or Fisher exact test was used to assess the differences between categorical variables, and for continuous variables the analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used. A multivariate regression model was used to assess the risk factors for final best corrected visual acuity. Statistically significant p values were considered those <0.05. 3. Instrument- or software-specific information needed to interpret the data: The data were analysed using Stata Statistical Software, version 14.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas, USA). 4. Standards and calibration information, if appropriate: NONE. 5. Environmental/experimental conditions: NONE. 6. Describe any quality-assurance procedures performed on the data: All data was double checked when data was acquired and entered in excel file. 7. People involved with sample collection, processing, analysis and/or submission: Jasmin Zvorničanin and Edita Zvorničanin DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR: [SES and decreasing incidence of ocular injuries in B&H] 1. Number of variables: 43 2. Number of cases/rows: 420 3. Variable List: 1. Year12 – Patients were grouped in two groups, from the first and second study period. 2. AgeGroup18-65 – Age was categorized into three groups: less than 18, 18–65 and more than 65 years. 3. Gender - Male or Female. 4. Rural/Urban – Based on place of residence patients were grouped into 2 categories: Rural or Urban. 5. OccupatCateg - Occupations were grouped into five categories: manual workers, fire and explosion hazard workers, agricultural workers, not working, and other. 6. Employment – If patient was officially employed at the time of the injury. 7. EmployCateg - Category of employment as described in Methods. 8. Education – Level of education as described in Methods. 9. SESscore – Socio-economic score as described in Methods. 10. SESCateg - Based on the index of social position values, all patients were categorized into three social classes: upper (11–27), middle (28–43), and lower social class (44–77). 11. Season - Season of injury: spring, summer, fall, winter. 12. Workday – If injury occurred on working day or weekend. 13. InjuryOnset81624 - Time of the injury onset (working time 8 am–3 pm, afternoon 4 pm–11pm and late evening time 12 pm–7 am). 14. TimeToAdmision2122448 - time from the injury occurrence to hospital admission (less than 2 h, 2–12 h, 12–48 h and more than 2 days). 15. LengthHospital714 – duration of hospitalization (1–6 days; 7–13 days and 14 days or more). 16. LocationInjury – According to the location of ocular injury, the data were classified into six groups: work-related injuries, home-related injuries, recreational/sport- related injuries, road accident-related injuries, assaults-related injuries, and other various outdoor activities related injuries. 17. EyeProtectWork - Information on the use of eye protection in work related injuries. 18. WorkInjury – If injury occurred at the working place. 19. Mechanism - According to injury mechanism, patients were grouped into the following categories: blunt force object, sharp force object, road and explosion, biologic or organic material, and other injuries. 20. BETTtype - The injuries were classified by Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology. 21. TypeOC – Type of ocular injury: closed globe injury (CGI) or open globe injury (OGI). 22. EyesNumb – Number of eyes affected: one or both eyes. 23. SideR1L0 – Side of the affected eye, right or left. 24. Cornea - If cornea was affected by the injury. 25. Sclera - If sclera was affected by the injury. 26. AntChamber - If anterior chamber was affected by the injury. 27. Hyphaema – If hyphaema was present at the hospital admission. 28. LensStatus – Status of the crystalline lens at the hospital admission. 29. Cataract – Presence of cataract at the time of the hospital admission. 30. Vitreous - If corpus vitreum was affected by the injury. 31. Haematovitreus – If there was vitreous hemorrhage at the hospital admission. 32. Retina - If retina was affected by the injury. 33. RetDetachment – If there was retinal detachment present at the hospital admission 34. IOFB – If there was Intraouclar foreign body at the hospital admission. 35. EOFB - If there was extraocular foreign body at the hospital admission. 36. PeriorbitAdnex - If periorbit and ocular adnexa were affected by the injury. 37. OTSCateg –The ocular trauma score (OTS) was categorized into: category 1 low OTS - categories one, two, and three and category 2 high OTS including categories four and five. 38. OTCS - According to the Ocular Trauma Classification System (OTCS) and based on the wound location all injuries were classified as follows: Zone I, Zone II and Zone III injuries. 39. InitialVA – Visual acuty at the hospital admission.Initial and final BCVA were classified as no light perception (NLP), light perception (LP)/hand motion (HM), 1/200–19/200, 20/200–20/50, and ≥20/40. 40. FinalVA – Visual acuity at the hospital discharge. 41. VisualOutcome - The final visual acuity of ≥ 20/200 was defined as good and final visual acuity of less than 20/200 as poor visual outcome. 42. Improvement – Improvement in visual acuity based on initial and final visual outcome. 43. NumberSurg – Number of surgical procedures during the hospitalization. 4. Missing data codes: NONE 5. Specialized formats or other abbreviations used: PCIOL – posterior chamber intraocular lens
创建时间:
2023-06-28
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务