Supplemental Material Table S1-S9

Table S1. Genome
details of Sulfurospirillum genomes utilized in this study. All
information was compiled and retrieved from the RefSeq database and NCBI.

Table S2.
Genome-wide pairwise comparisons for the delineation of Sulfurospirillum
species. The distances (e.g., digital DDH estimates and confidence intervals)
between each pair of Sulfurospirillum strains were calculated by three
different formula d0, d4, and d6. Formulae d0
and d6 measure the similarity in gene content, the formula d4
reports a similarity based on sequence identity.

Table S3. ANIm values
calculated for each pair of Sulfurospirillum strains by Jspecies.

Table S4. ANIb
values calculated for each pair of Sulfurospirillum strains by Jspecies.

Table S5. Functioning-based
comparison of metabolic reconstruction for strains ACSTCE (A) and
ACSDCE (B) by RAST.

Table S6. Sequence-based
comparison of metabolic reconstruction for strains ACSTCE and ACSDCE
by RAST using the coding sequences of strain ACSTCE as a reference.

Table S7. Sequence-based
comparison of metabolic reconstruction for strains ACSTCE and ACSDCE
by RAST using the coding sequences of strain ACSDCE as a reference.

Table
S8. Annotation of the strain ACSTCE plasmid sequence using the
eggNOG-mapper.

Table
S9. Annotation of the strain ACSDCE plasmid sequence using the
eggNOG-mapper.