Supplemental Material for Sandler et al., 2020

Figure
S1 Visualization
of a low-quality genomic region that was filtered from our analyses.

Figure
S2 Allelic
coverage at heterozygous sites before and after filtering.

Figure
S3
Visualization of a validated de novo mutation from both Illumina short
read and Sanger sequencing data.

Figure
S4
Visualisation of a putative de novo mutation that was identified as a
likely sequencing error

Figure S5 Visualisation of a putative de novo
mutation that was identified as a likely genome misassembly error

Table S1 List of de
novo mutations identified in two species of duckweed

Table S2 Mutation rate estimates under
the observed allelic bias at de novo mutations

Table S3 Mutation rate estimates
under several scenarios of allelic bias at de novo mutant sites in salt
stressed mutation accumulation lines

Table S4 Mutation rate estimates
under several scenarios of allelic bias at de novo mutant sites in
control mutation accumulation lines

Table S5 Number and
fraction of callable sites under several scenarios of allelic bias at de
novo mutant sites

Table S6
Summary of mutation rate estimates retrieved from the literature