five

A Comparison of the Performance of Modular Standalone Do-It-Yourself Ion Mobility Spectrometry Systems

收藏
Figshare2023-03-14 更新2026-04-28 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/A_Comparison_of_the_Performance_of_Modular_Standalone_Do-It-Yourself_Ion_Mobility_Spectrometry_Systems/22269359
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
As the spectrum of ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) applications expands and more experimental configurations are developed, identifying the correct platform for an experimental campaign becomes more challenging for researchers. Additionally, metrics that compare performance (Rp, for example) often have nuanced differences in definition between platforms that render direct comparisons difficult. Here we present a comparison of three do-it-yourself (DIY) drift tubes that are relatively low cost and easy to construct, where the performance of each is evaluated based on three different metrics: resolving power, the ideality of resolving powers, and accuracy/precision of K0 values. The standard PCBIMS design developed by Reinecke and Clowers (Reinecke, T.; Clowers, B. H. HardwareX 2018, 4, e00030) provided the highest resolving power (>90) and the highest ideality of resolving power ratios (>90% at best) of the three systems. However, the flexible tube (FlexIMS) construction as described by Smith et al. (Smith, B. L. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92 (13), 9104−9112) exhibited the highest degree of precision of K0 values (relative standard deviation of <0.42%). Depending on the application, the drift tube variants presented and evaluated here offer a low-cost alternative to commercial drift-tube systems with levels of performance that approach theoretical maxima.
创建时间:
2023-03-14
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作