Frog incidence frequency and soundscape diversity data used to construct the case study in Luypaert et al. (2021)

This data was used to construct the case study in: ENTER FULL REFERENCE HERE ONCE PUBLISHED 1. Frog incidence frequency data This data represents a subset of the data described in: Bueno, A. S., Masseli, G. S., Kaefer, I. L., & Peres, C. A. (2020). Sampling design may obscure species–area relationships in landscape‐scale field studies. Ecography, 43(1), 107-118. The data consists of a subset of 105 sites on 62 forest islands and 4 continuous forest sites. The data was obtained for the project Ecological Impacts of River Damming on Forest Bird Assemblages in the Brazilian Amazon. Find out more at https://www.rufford.org/projects/anderson_saldanha_bueno. Raw data files corresponding to these frog observations are available for inspection on the ARBIMON platform: https://arbimon.rfcx.org/project/soundscape-frogdiv-relationship 2. Acoustic index data For the purposes of the case study described in Luypaert et al. (2021), the oscillation index was used. The oscillation index was computed using a sampling rate of 41,000 Hz and a window size of 256. This metric quantifies the number of pulses, or amplitude modulations per second, and acoustic feature typical of insect and frog vocalizations. Indices were computed in the R programming language using the 'index_calc' function in the soundscapeR package (https://github.com/ThomasLuypaertGitHub/soundscapeR), which in turn calls on the QUT Ecoacoustics Analysis Programs software for its index computations (https://ap.qut.ecoacoustics.info/tutorials/01-usingap/practical?tabs=windows).