TABLE 6 in Integrative taxonomic approaches revealed a new species of the Cyrtodactylus irregularis complex (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from Gia Lai Province, Central Highlands of Vietnam

TABLE 6. Morphological comparisons of Cyrtodactylus ayunpaensis sp. nov. and other species of the Cyrtodactylys irregularis group from Vietnam.Abbreviations:? = data not available in literature; * = regenerated or broken tail. Character abbreviations are listed in the materials and methods. No.SpeciesSVL (mm)TL (mm)VSEFSFPPP (M)PP (F)LD4LT4Color pattern of dorsumSubcaudalReferences1Cyrtodactylus ayunpaensis sp. nov81.3–91.572.1–104.352–687–11absent0015–1917–19bandedpresent2C. arndti73.4–80.950.1*–91.5126–385–110–26615–2017–22bandedpresentNgo et al. 20233C. badenensis59.3–74.158.6–82.425–29absentabsent00?18–22bandedpresentNguyen et al. 20064C. bidoupimontis74.0–86.375.0–86.038–438–10absent4–6015–2018–23bandedabsentNazarov et al. 20125C. bugiamapensis58.6–76.865.3–83.036–466–10absent7–110–715–1717–20blotchedabsentNazarov et al. 20126C. caovansungi90.4–94.0120.038–4486902223–25bandedpresentOrlov et al. 20077C. cattienensis43.5–69.051.0–64.728–423–8absent6–8012–1614–19bandedabsentGeissler et al. 20098C. chumuensis52.4–67.541.5*–51.4*43–454–50–26–7?16–1917–21bandedabsentNgo et al. 20239C. chungi66.6–68.562.8*–82.2*30–314–6absent7615–1817–20bandedabsentOstrowski et al. 202110C. cryptus62.5–90.863.6–88.447–50absentabsent9–11018–1920–23bandedabsentHeidrich et al. 2007; Luu et al. 201611C. cucdongensis55.8–65.953.5*–81.335–445–9absent5–64–613–1815–20bandedabsentSchneider et al. 201412C. culaochamensis69.8–79.889.7–91.245–50absentabsent7–8absent18–1920–23bandedabsentNgo et al. 202013C. datimax 70.1max 57.342–484–73–45–6??18–19blotchedabsentNgo Van Tri 201314C. gialaiensis50.1–62.842.2*–63.6*38–45absentabsent9–100–8 pitted14–1515–17bandedabsentLuu et al. 201715C. huynhi67.2–79.851.7–78.643–463–53–87–90–8 pitted14–1717–21bandedabsentNgo & Bauer 200816C. irregularis72.0–86.066.0–74.038–457–8absent5–70–615–1618–19blotchedabsentSmith et al. 192117C. kingsadai83.0–94.0max 117.039–469–120–47–94–819–2121–25bandedpresentZiegler et al. 201318C. orlovi61.0–77.752.2*–71.2*36–393–8absent5–6015–1716–19bandedabsentDo et al. 202119C. phumyensis63.5–66.873.2*-74.6*33–415–7absent5–76 pitted18–1918–21bandedabsentOstrowski et al. 202020C. phuocbinhensis46.0–60.476.143–475absent7016–2117–19striped/ blotchedabsentNguyen et al. 201321C. pseudoquadrivirgatus48.6–83.355.7–82.341–57absentabsent5–95–1015–2116–25blotchedabsentRösler et al. 200822C. raglai87.5– 111.7113.4–135.036–399–10absent50?21–22bandedpresentNguyen et al. 202123C. sangi49.9–56.340.8*–47.9*374absent74 pitted??bandedabsentPauwels et al. 201824C. takouensis74.7–81.143.7–91.039–403–50–23–4016–1718–20bandedpresentNgo & Bauer 200825C. taynguyenensis60.0–85.066.0–94.042–49absentabsent6013–1817–21blotchedabsentNguyen et al. 201326C. yangbayensis78.5–92.391.3*–109.139–465–160–26–8016–1915–17bandedpresentNgo & Chan 201027C. ziegleri84.6–93.095.0–107.033–398–100–65–80–816–1918–21bandedabsentNazarov et al. 2008 ......continued on the next page