Evaluating Cryptosporidium Oocyst Removal in SSF: Impact of Underwater Skimming and Dry Skimming

Data for Evaluating Cryptosporidium Oocyst Removal in SSF: Impact of Underwater Skimming and Dry SkimmingCryptosporidium is a protozoan parasite that presents significant challenges to water supply security due to its resilience against conventional chemical disinfection. This study evaluates the effectiveness of two slow sand filter (SSF) skimming techniques—dry skimming (DS) and underwater skimming (UWS)—in removing Cryptosporidium oocysts under pilot-scale conditions using 10 filters. Oocyst retention was monitored during dosing, post-dosing, and following each skimming event. Results demonstrated that UWS achieved superior pathogen removal, evidenced by fewer oocyst breakthroughs and higher cumulative log retention values (LRVs). During dosing, UWS filters attained LRVs consistently exceeding 6.6, whereas DS filters averaged 5.6. In the post-dosing period, UWS retained LRVs above 6.9, while DS averaged 5.9. A quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) indicated a substantially lower probability of illness from oocyst breakthrough in UWS-treated water, with a daily risk of ~2.6 × 10⁻⁶ for immunocompetent individuals, compared to up to 8.2 × 10⁻⁶ in DS-treated water—equating to a 3.2-fold risk reduction. These findings highlight that the UWS maintenance technique enhances SSF operation by improving pathogen retention while enabling minimal filter downtime, thereby contributing to improved water safety and public health protection. The work also provides novel empirical data and theoretical predictions regarding the potential risk of Cryptosporidium penetration or compromised water quality arising from the routine requirement to skim SSFs.