Literature Review on the State of the Art of Social Impact Assessments of Technological Innovations. Main Roadblocks to Measure Social Impact of Technological Innovations

The dataset provides detailed information about the articles included in the study, using the following criteria and data extracted:
1. Name of the Method: The specific method used to measure social impacts.
2. Purpose of the Method: The primary goal or intended outcome of the method.
3. Detailed Description of the Method: A comprehensive explanation of how the method is applied.
4. Brief Overview of the Case Study: A summary of the case study associated with the method.
5. Addressing Social Impacts of Technological Innovations: Whether the method specifically addresses the social impacts related to technological innovations.
6. Degree of Measurement of ISO 26000 Core Subjects: The extent to which the method measures the seven core subjects defined by ISO 26000, rated on a five-level scale (from minimum to high) based on criteria in Table 3.
7. Identified Social Impacts (Positive or Negative): A determination of whether the social impacts identified by the method are positive or negative.
8. Mitigation or Exploitation Strategies: Any strategies mentioned in the article for mitigating negative impacts or exploiting positive ones.
9. Validation of Available Data (Yes/No): Verification of whether the method provides the following information:
9.1. Description of the Method: Clear explanation of the measurement process.
9.2. Required Equipment: The tools and equipment needed for performing the measurement.
9.3. Team Skills and Qualifications: The necessary skills and qualifications of the team conducting the assessment.
9.4. Controlled Environmental Conditions: Factors that need to be managed, such as: Temporal factors: Timing and duration of the assessment, Respondent factors: Considerations of anonymity and confidentiality, Questionnaire design: Clarity and neutrality of the questions used, Sampling methods: Representativeness and randomization of the sample, Data collection: Consistency in the method and technology used.
9.5. Performance Attributes: Information on attributes like measurement uncertainty, stability, maximum permissible error, repeatability, and reproducibility.
This dataset enables a thorough evaluation of the methods used in assessing social impacts and helps identify any gaps in addressing the key principles of social responsibility.

本数据集详尽地记录了研究中包含的各类文章，并按照以下标准与提取的数据进行整理：
1. 方法名称：用于衡量社会影响的特定方法。
2. 方法目的：该方法的主要目标或预期成果。
3. 方法详细描述：对方法应用的综合阐释。
4. 案例研究概述：与该方法相关联的案例研究的简要总结。
5. 应对技术创新的社会影响：该方法是否专门针对与技术创新相关的社会影响。
6. ISO 26000 核心主题测量程度：该方法在衡量ISO 26000定义的七个核心主题方面的范围，根据表3中的标准，采用五级评分（从最低至最高）。
7. 识别的社会影响（正面或负面）：确定该方法识别的社会影响是正面还是负面。
8. 缓解或利用策略：文章中提到的任何缓解负面影响或利用正面影响的策略。
9. 可用数据的验证（是/否）：验证该方法是否提供以下信息：
9.1. 方法描述：对测量过程的清晰解释。
9.2. 所需设备：执行测量的工具和设备。
9.3. 团队技能和资质：进行评估的团队所需具备的技能和资质。
9.4. 控制环境条件：需要管理的因素，例如：时间因素：评估的时机和持续时间，受访者因素：匿名性和保密性的考虑，问卷设计：所使用问题的清晰度和中立性，抽样方法：样本的代表性和随机性，数据收集：方法和技术的连贯性。
9.5. 性能属性：关于测量不确定性、稳定性、最大允许误差、重复性和再现性的信息。
此数据集使得对评估社会影响所使用的方法进行全面评估成为可能，并有助于识别在应对社会责任核心原则方面存在的任何不足。