five

Relationship between very low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations not due to statin therapy and risk of type 2 diabetes: A US-based cross-sectional observational study using electronic health records

收藏
Figshare2018-08-28 更新2026-04-29 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Relationship_between_very_low_low-density_lipoprotein_cholesterol_concentrations_not_due_to_statin_therapy_and_risk_of_type_2_diabetes_A_US-based_cross-sectional_observational_study_using_electronic_health_records/7017797
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
BackgroundObservations from statin clinical trials and from Mendelian randomization studies suggest that low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations may be associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Despite the findings from statin clinical trials and genetic studies, there is little direct evidence implicating low LDL-C concentrations in increased risk of T2DM.Methods and findingsWe used de-identified electronic health records (EHRs) at Vanderbilt University Medical Center to compare the risk of T2DM in a cross-sectional study among individuals with very low (≤60 mg/dl, N = 8,943) and normal (90–130 mg/dl, N = 71,343) LDL-C levels calculated using the Friedewald formula. LDL-C levels associated with statin use, hospitalization, or a serum albumin level N = 33,039 after applying the T2DM algorithm to identify cases and controls), the risk of T2DM was increased in the very low compared to normal LDL-C group (odds ratio [OR] 2.06, 95% CI 1.80–2.37; P 2 × 10−16). The findings remained significant in sensitivity analyses. The association between low LDL-C levels and T2DM was significant in males (OR 2.43, 95% CI 2.00–2.95; P 2 × 10−16) and females (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.42–2.12; P = 6.88 × 10−8); in normal weight (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.59–2.98; P = 1.1× 10−6), overweight (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.65–2.83; P = 1.73× 10−8), and obese (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.65–2.41; P = 8 × 10−13) categories; and in individuals with LDL-C P = 3.01× 10−8) and LDL-C 40–60 mg/dl (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.71–2.32; P 2.0× 10−16). The association was significant in individuals of European ancestry (OR 2.67, 95% CI 2.25–3.17; P 2 × 10−16) but not in those of African ancestry (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.81–1.46; P = 0.56). A limitation was that we only compared groups with very low and normal LDL-C levels; also, since this was not an inception cohort, we cannot exclude the possibility of reverse causation.ConclusionsVery low LDL-C concentrations occurring in the absence of statin treatment were significantly associated with T2DM risk in a large EHR population; this increased risk was present in both sexes and all BMI categories, and in individuals of European ancestry but not of African ancestry. Longitudinal cohort studies to assess the relationship between very low LDL-C levels not associated with lipid-lowering therapy and risk of developing T2DM will be important.
创建时间:
2018-08-28
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务