Supporting information for: Discrimination ability of central visual field testing using stimulus size I, II, and III and relationship with macular ganglion cell thickness in chiasmal compression

Purpose: To compare the relationship between macular ganglion cell layer (mGCL) thickness and 10-2 visual field (VF) sensitivity using different stimulus sizes in patients with temporal hemianopia from chiasmal compression.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 30 eyes from 25 patients with temporal VF loss on 24-2 SITA standard automated perimetry due to previous chiasmal compression and 30 healthy eyes (23 controls). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the macular area and 10-2 VF testing using Goldmann stimulus size I (GI), II (GII), and III (GIII) were performed in the Octopus 900 perimeter. For the sake of analysis, mGCL thickness and VF data were segregated into four quadrants (two temporal and two nasal) and two halves (temporal and nasal) centered on the fovea, and the groups were compared using generalized estimated equations. The discrimination ability of GI, GII, and GIII was evaluated, as was the correlation between mGCL and 10-2 VF sensitivity using GI,..., In this study, our purpose was to compare the relationship between macular ganglion cell layer (mGCL) thickness and 10-2 visual field (VF) sensitivity using different stimulus sizes in patients with temporal hemianopia from chiasmal compression.  To do so, a cross-sectional study was conducted involving 30 eyes from 25 patients with temporal VF loss on 24-2 SITA standard automated perimetry due to previous chiasmal compression and 30 healthy eyes (23 controls). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the macular area and 10-2 VF testing using Goldmann stimulus size I (GI), II (GII), and III (GIII) were performed in the Octopus 900 perimeter. For the sake of analysis, mGCL thickness and VF data were segregated into four quadrants (two temporal and two nasal) and two halves (temporal and nasal) centered on the fovea, and the groups were compared using generalized estimated equations. The discrimination ability of GI, GII, and GIII was evaluated, as was the correlation between mGCL and 10-2 ..., , # DATA WITH SUPPORTING INFORMATION FOR THE MANUSCRIPT PONE-D-23-26160R1

Give a brief summary of dataset contents, contextualized in experimental procedures and results.

## Description of the data and file structure

DATA ARE PRESENTED IN AN EXCELL FILE INCLUDING

1\) Demographic data of participants

·       column A has a list of patients (from line 3 to 32) and controls (from line 35 to 64). When the number is repeated it indicates that the two eyes of the patient or control were evaluated.

column B indicates the gender of patient or control. Column C the age of the subject. Column D the eye studied (RIGHT EYE=OD, LEFT EYE=OE) 

2\) Structural parameters evalated

·        Structural parameters (macular ganglion cell layer (mGCL) thickness in microns obtained using optical coherence tomography in patients and controls (Columns: F, G, H, I, J, K and L) divided in qudrants (SN=SUPERONASAL, ST=SUPEROTEMPORAL, IN=INFERONASAL, IT=INFEROTEMPORAL), in the nasal hemiretina, temporal hemi...