Replication Data for: Do human rights matter in bilateral aid allocation? A quantitative analysis of 21 donor countries, Social Science Quarterly, 84 (3), 2003, pp. 650-666
收藏DataONE2017-04-18 更新2024-06-26 收录
下载链接:
https://search.dataone.org/view/sha256:c95a87a753d7e9c7ec16faf77d499ff192593037e8de5c45b9f3b632b2616b6c
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
Objective. To analyze the role of human rights in aid allocation of 21 donor countries. Methods. Econometric analysis is applied to a panel covering the period 1985 to 1997. Results. Respect for civil/political rights plays a statistically significant role for most donors at the aid eligibility stage. Personal integrity rights, on the other hand, have a positive impact on aid eligibility for few donors only. At the level stage, most donors fail to promote respect for human rights in a consistent manner and often give more aid to countries with a poor record on either civil/ political or personal integrity rights. No systematic difference is apparent between the like-minded countries commonly regarded as committed to human rights (Canada, Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden) and the other donors. Conclusions. Contrary to their verbal commitment, donor countries do not consistently reward respect for human rights in their foreign aid allocation.
创建时间:
2023-11-21



