The gain-loss structure of 1X-IGT (Bechara et al., 2000).

sadadan both versions s also performed to analyze the effects of gender on each version of IGT.*Note: Expected value of decks A and B was increased -150 while EV of decks C and D was increased 25 in each section.1st section: Deck A: −250 + 0*(−150) = −250; Deck B: −250 + 0*(−150) = −250; Deck C: 250 + 0*(25) = 250; Deck D: 250 + 0*(25) = 2502nd section: Deck A: −250 + 1*(−150) = −400; Deck B: −250 + 1*(−150) = −400; Deck C: 250 + 1*(25) = 275; Deck D: 250 + 1*(25) = 2753rd section: Deck A: −250 + 2*(−150) = −550; Deck B: −250 + 2*(−150) = −550; Deck C: 250 + 2*(25) = 300; Deck D: 250 + 2*(25) = 3004th section: Deck A: −250 + 3*(−150) = −700; Deck B: −250 + 3*(−150) = −700; Deck C: 250 + 3*(25) = 325; Deck D: 250 + 3*(25) = 3255th section: Deck A: −250 + 4*(−150) = −850; Deck B: −250 + 4*(−150) = −850; Deck C: 250 + 4*(25) = 350; Deck D: 250 + 4*(25) = 3506th section: Deck A: −250 + 5*(−150) = −1000; Deck B: −250 + 5*(−150) = −1000; Deck C: 250 + 5*(25) = 375; Deck D: 250 + 5*(25) = 375